Hoi Skizo.

[chalice]

Why did you remove Old Geezer's antagonistic novelty penis pic?

It isn't the first time he's posted a similar image.

The cunt apple pic springs to mind.

He also posted an erect penis, if memory serves.

Is he the only pornographic troll who is tolerated on this forum? Does he get special treatment?

Cos people have been banned for much less, in my experience, on this forum.

[Skiz]

I don't recall any members being overly harshed for such pics but I suppose it well could have happened.

The old geezer has been warned on multiple occasions for posting (that pic and the apple one) genitalia before. I suppose I was being generous by simply removing it.

[chalice]

In your innocence, though, what you did was defuse his permeating nastiness.

He posts nothing on these boards but inept derision, which, I suppose, is his right.

However, by removing that pic, you dilute how much of a silly, impotent old fucker he really is.

It's a form of censorship and it doesn't sit too well with me.

Are mods on this forum to be a safety-net for his fuckery?

[tesco]

Funny enough he received an "inappropriate pic - LAST WARNING" infraction back in august.

[JPaul]

ip ban I think, it getting tedious now.

Well if I'm honest it's been tedious since he started.

[Proper Bo]

Well stop using that account then, bawlbag,

[JPaul]

Someone's got to do it.

[chalice]

Nobody is that genious at being a fucking idiot.

Except maybe Sherman.

Hypo ftw!!!

[Rat Faced]

Has he posted a Turnip shaped like a thingy yet?

Worked for Blackadder..

[Skiz]

In your innocence, though, what you did was defuse his permeating nastiness.

He posts nothing on these boards but inept derision, which, I suppose, is his right.

However, by removing that pic, you dilute how much of a silly, impotent old fucker he really is.

It's a form of censorship and it doesn't sit too well with me.

Are mods on this forum to be a safety-net for his fuckery?

Sorry it doesn't sit well, but you're adept enough to know that me removing his pic wasn't in an effort to cover up his shortcomings, but merely removing a pic that broke the rules; nothing more.

Had I taken a second to look at his profile and see that I had previously given him (in written form no less) a "LAST WARNING" for posting pics which violate the rules, I may have acted in a progressive disciplinary manner, but as it were I didn't see the point in going further.

Or maybe I'm just lazy.

Now that I think about it, I'm going to go see what pic he was warned about. If it was the exact one I'm gonna rethink this.