Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Load all of Microsoft Office in 0.5 seconds

  1. #11
    micropino's Avatar Lossless Ears BT Rep: +10BT Rep +10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    155
    Quote Originally Posted by kaiweiler View Post
    http://i.gizmodo.com/5166798/24-soli...e-in-5-seconds

    Pretty sick speeds! and 24x256gb SSD drives is just retarded...

    However, the build is messy, the case is ugly, and the guy sounds like a tool.
    NO NO NO, I was looking @ speeds 2 years from today Good thinking but very risky system (1 SSD damaged and everything is gone!)

    Quote Originally Posted by clocker View Post
    I want a Z-drive.

    Got one of those laying around, D.?
    I want one toooooo... Days are running and we will have them one day

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #12
    Artemis's Avatar ¿ןɐɯɹou ǝq ʎɥʍ BT Rep: +3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    5,431
    For those paranoid about the data loss, you could run a RAID 0+1 configuration and use SATA drives for the backup image. By the time you have the money to slam down on an array like this the extra cost (if you don't already have the drives) would be minimal.

    4d7920686f76657263726166742069732066756c6c206f662065656c73


  3. Software & Hardware   -   #13
    micropino's Avatar Lossless Ears BT Rep: +10BT Rep +10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    155
    Quote Originally Posted by Artemis View Post
    For those paranoid about the data loss, you could run a RAID 0+1 configuration and use SATA drives for the backup image. By the time you have the money to slam down on an array like this the extra cost (if you don't already have the drives) would be minimal.
    sounds good

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #14
    i'd like to see all of those uberheavy adobe's softwares loading at sametime Edit: lol wtf ^^
    Last edited by TeHShadowZ; 03-18-2009 at 04:14 AM.

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #15
    tesco's Avatar woowoo
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    21,664
    Quote Originally Posted by Artemis View Post
    For those paranoid about the data loss, you could run a RAID 0+1 configuration and use SATA drives for the backup image. By the time you have the money to slam down on an array like this the extra cost (if you don't already have the drives) would be minimal.
    With RAID 1 aren't you limited to the speed of the slower drive?
    For example, if you're writing 300mb/s constantly to your SSD drives how can you have the same data written on your mechanical hard disks? That buffer would run out fast.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •