Well she was responsible for McDonald's turnover rising 200% and therefore the capitalisation of modern society.
Well she was responsible for McDonald's turnover rising 200% and therefore the capitalisation of modern society.
Now go away.
yeah but the clubs are the ones charging you to get in .The more money they get off sky the cheaper it should be ,the clubs are the real villains here ,its estimated that they get about £50.000.000 every year of sky .Newcastle have a left back spanish bloke who is possibly the worst player ive ever seen ,they try to get rid of him but hes getting 40 grand a week which means they have to keep him even though they cant play him because hes so bad he will get them relegated so the players are doing well out of you too.i dont blame sky its a good service
Its not really about Football anymore its like PPV Heavyweight Boxing or something, where every match is so much more important that the last one, and you have to see it at the pub while watching the other game at the same time. what is all that about?
Sometimes none of the answers get it just right. If so, pick "No Best Answer". Voters DO NOT get any points for voting on the No Best Answer.
Man Utd will be fine, probably the biggest club in SPORTS, even though they have massive loans and debit, the rise in debit is getting smaller each year, and once they replace AIG with another massive sponsor and selling ronaldo for £75mil plus things should be fine.
p.s. the biggest problem of English Football is the monopoly of the top 4.
That's just shite. That is not what a monopoly is.
The only way that would even begin to make sense were if the 4 clubs you mentioned were some sort of consortium, which they aren't.
Oh and suggesting that Manchester United can wipe away their debt by it not getting worse year on year and selling Ronaldo is just naive tripe.
"there is nothing misogynistic about anything, stop trippin.
i type this way because im black and from nyc chill son "
Bookmarks