Trackers are not 'the scene'. And it's always a 'popularity contest', even in the 'real scene'. It's all about fame, status and yes, money.
Trackers are not 'the scene'. And it's always a 'popularity contest', even in the 'real scene'. It's all about fame, status and yes, money.
TRADING SUCKS DEAL WITH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ever considered the fact that not all sites might actually want 100,000 users?
It's not about "saving" anything for anyone, it's about trying to keep the size of the userbase under control.
The mentality of filesharingtalk users and their site levelling systems doesn't really come into the site plan for most trackers to be honest.
Squizzle,
That's only because there are too many trackers.... and they feel they can basically do w/e they want... but, no worries.. if more tracker start shutting down, they'll see things differently.. OH!! Wait... i forget about this hydra thing they claim will save them... silly me ..
Last edited by jasperr; 04-22-2009 at 05:05 PM.
TRADING SUCKS DEAL WITH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i don't think any of the closed trackers had over 100.000 or near that amount so the question is not logica. I know it's better to have let's say 10.000 users actives then 100.000 not active.
Bookmarks