-
Poster
BT Rep: +1
i was downloading 128k but now, i download at least 320k
-
-
06-08-2009, 05:58 PM
Music -
#12
Paint it Pink
BT Rep: +1
v0 majority of time these days need to save the space and sometimes v2.
-
-
06-09-2009, 12:36 AM
Music -
#13
Member
Best available. Right now I'm listening to a demo from the early 80's that's showing ~96kb/s VBR, I have some mp3s encoded as low as 60 (not counting spoken word, like lectures and that kind of thing).
When I can, I get FLAC, I don't use a mobile mp3 player, so I don't particularly care about file size. Its not even really the sound quality, its just that its worth more from a file sharing perspective. Lossless ends all bitrate arguments as you can encode it to whatever the hell you'd like.
-
-
06-09-2009, 12:52 AM
Music -
#14
always annoying
Yeah, as 'bluju' said, the best available; for me too flac is the way to go, though I still get most of my music in mp3, the higher the bit rate the better.
And if i get al album in flac, but I want to put it in my Zen, then I just encode a copy to mp3 320.
Last edited by worldpease; 06-09-2009 at 12:56 AM.
-
-
06-09-2009, 01:18 AM
Music -
#15
Member
I download FLAC and convert it to 320k
-
-
06-09-2009, 01:22 AM
Music -
#16
Hearty
Lossless: FLAC
Lossy: LAME V0 prefered, or V2 (scene). 320kbps CBR is a waste of space.
-
-
06-09-2009, 01:54 AM
Music -
#17
WOw thanks for the Head up dudes.....that was very usefull once again thankyou
-
-
06-09-2009, 12:41 PM
Music -
#18
Member
flac always
-
-
06-10-2009, 02:22 PM
Music -
#19
Poster
BT Rep: +1
-
-
06-10-2009, 05:39 PM
Music -
#20
I have 320kbps only. If it`s available for the moment with worse quality i am waiting for a better one
So ... 320kbps is fine for me too.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks