Originally posted by Justsomeguy+30 September 2003 - 11:41--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Justsomeguy @ 30 September 2003 - 11:41)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Busyman@30 September 2003 - 09:26
This whole thread has been bastardized. Now everyone's naming any joe blow movie a cult classic. Take a look at this thread it is much better and you might get some good movies out of it.
Here we go again
Who are you to say what does and what doesn't define a genre?
Personally, I just dont care whether some of the films listed in this topic fit the genre or not... It's an inexact genre... thats the beauty of it... and this is just a p2p community forum, not a national film archive.
Try to get a bit of perspective. Lives will not be lost because of inconsistent information here.
By the way, I found the sweeping accusation that "everyone's naming any joe blow movie a cult classic." not only arrogant, but patently wrong.
Sure, some folks' opinions may differ from yours.. but if you have a problem with that, try to remember that it takes all kinds to make a world.
Keep 'em coming folks.. and to hell with the nit-pickers [/b][/quote]
And yea The Sound Of Music is a "cult classic"
Sorry for saying this thread has been bastardized but this thread is more like:
"Name Films You Liked"
Folks ARE naming any joe blow movie and calling it a cult classic.
It is like naming Terms Of Endearment and then someone says that not a cult classic and then I say well..... it's a cult classic to ME. Bullshit
And yes certain things DO define a genre.
Bookmarks