Are Intel Loosers With Their P4 Ee Launch?

[Neo 721]

Intel have always been behind AMD the only reason they got ahead with the p4 3.2 GHZ was because they panicked. In doing that they were supposed to have spent extensive resource's and funding in order to get ahead, this could be the reason for high price of them. For the same reason there hasent been a great deal of advertising for their next main processer.

[_John_Lennon_]

Originally posted by Neo 721@1 October 2003 - 16:22
a great deal of advertising for their next main processor.

They have been saying for the past year their main focus was to push the Centrino line of notebook branded setups, etc etc.

[Jay]

i'l go with 1

[adamp2p]

I dont know about all of that guys.

I think in the long run all of the competition benefits us consumers.

[Amarjit]

I reckon the Itanium has failed, before it has even been launched, unless Intel do some serious modifications to it.

The Xeon, however, is a different story, it is easily capable of competing with the Athlon64.

[Cygnuz-Y]

The Xeon, however, is a different story, it is easily capable of competing with the Athlon64.

So whats so great about Xeon, as long as i know Xeon still is a 32-bit, how can a 32-bit can compete with 64-bit ??????????

[ultimatejester]

Originally posted by Amarjit@2 October 2003 - 17:40
I reckon the Itanium has failed

that is so true

[fallenknight308]

I heard somewhere that amd's "are the gamers friend"
Is this tru, or is it just more marketing?
(I believe that amd is targeting "impulse" buyers).
I'll wait for the prices on that 64 bit chip to go down before
considering a purchase.