@youann64 & duckater:if you had read my post properly.. the word 'fiasco' (abject or utterly humiliating failure) was used in the context of bans initiated without sufficient proofs, or information faked to gain the upper hand in a personal feud.
@cabalo: for the record, i never pointed at albo. He is still enabled on a site i am involved with..and will continue as 'enabled' as long as he abides by the site rules.
Moving on..I don't support bans initiated without concrete evidence. On the contrary, I believe that everyone is innocent till proven guilty.
Hope i have been pretty clear this time around.
/me will try his best to be crystal clear with his comments on FST from now on.My bad that i left too much to be inferred.
//n00bEdit: Staffers idle on the support chan to help present and former members out. Even if that entails 'explaining' the reason that led to the site ban.
If they choose to ridicule him (wasting their own 'precious' time) instead of being precise, well..what else can i say apart from stating the fact that they are way too 'mature' and 'seasoned'.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Duckater
Bookmarks