Please?

[Bad-Day]

another kid, whit no girlfriend, who spent too much time, on line "hunting" llllllollllll hunting traders, instead off doing something productive for the society.
Why does he want the privs back ? i might have missed something, aint cfs enough for you?

[PlayeR]

someone wants cfs

me? i dont want it,man..im just curious and asking..dunno why you would come up with that..
sorry bumrocks for off-topic..this is the last time..

[deadalive1]

A trader uses deception as well, after all they are NOT on a tracker using THEIR account but the person who they traded with to get on said tracker. It's funny how some see it one way and use it to defend when it equally applies the other way too.

If you want to talk about only seeing it one way I'll vote for letting bumrocks have his privileges back if you can get one of the trackers that you are associated with let one person back in who knowingly broke one of their most fundamental rules.

It that doesn't sound fair then just let me give out your IP to random people here and that will do.

How does me pointing out that the statement I quoted could be applied the same way in the opposite direction, have anything to do with the threat you made of handing out my IP address?

If you support trading that's your right to do so, my right is to believe as I see fit for myself.

And on your question, when Person A gets into a tracker they agree to rules of said tracker. When Person A then proceeds to ignore said rules and then trades that account to Person B, they violated said rules of the tracker.
Now, when Persons A + B do it on a forum that condones it, but then gets pissed off when someone hunts said traders because according to their rules it's ok to trade yet NOT ok to have said traders be hunted (in essence protecting them), we know which group is preferred.

If the staff here decides someone doesn't get a second chance because of violation of THEIR rules then that is their right to do so, as it is for the staff who have accounts traded of their trackers.

I actually know a few people who have gone that route and had their accounts enabled again, whether it be because of a second chance or a change of heart on the account holders end, so it DOES happen albeit not frequently.

I, personally haven't hunted anyone here, I know better as I know how protected they are here. Hell, that's mostly the reason why FST lost a shitload of Reps from trackers here and along with it's credibility.

Not at anytime did I threaten you or even was I talking to you, yet you felt the need to cleverly word a threat about my IP address, and yes it was a threat no matter how you may of worded it...

[Night0wl]

I bet every single other user on here understood exactly what idol meant with that IP remark.

[IdolEyes787]

If you want to talk about only seeing it one way I'll vote for letting bumrocks have his privileges back if you can get one of the trackers that you are associated with let one person back in who knowingly broke one of their most fundamental rules.

It that doesn't sound fair then just let me give out your IP to random people here and that will do.

How does me pointing out that the statement I quoted could be applied the same way in the opposite direction, have anything to do with the threat you made of handing out my IP address?

If you support trading that's your right to do so, my right is to believe as I see fit for myself.

And on your question, when Person A gets into a tracker they agree to rules of said tracker. When Person A then proceeds to ignore said rules and then trades that account to Person B, they violated said rules of the tracker.
Now, when Persons A + B do it on a forum that condones it, but then gets pissed off when someone hunts said traders because according to their rules it's ok to trade yet NOT ok to have said traders be hunted (in essence protecting them), we know which group is preferred.

If the staff here decides someone doesn't get a second chance because of violation of THEIR rules then that is their right to do so, as it is for the staff who have accounts traded of their trackers.

I actually know a few people who have gone that route and had their accounts enabled again, whether it be because of a second chance or a change of heart on the account holders end, so it DOES happen albeit not frequently.

I, personally haven't hunted anyone here, I know better as I know how protected they are here. Hell, that's mostly the reason why FST lost a shitload of Reps from trackers here and along with it's credibility.

Not at anytime did I threaten you or even was I talking to you, yet you felt the need to cleverly word a threat about my IP address, and yes it was a threat no matter how you may of worded it...

I was trying to make the point that giving out IPs to anyone is wrong.I don't know how I could have possibly taken it any other way.Even if you misconstrued the intent entirely I can't see how you could misss that I said let me give out your IP address as in give me permission. How is that perceived a threat?
Let me take your coat.No.OK fine then keep it.I don't know how I could have been any clearer.

As for supporting trading I'd like you to find one instance of word or deed to support that statement.
Yeah I mod here and there are traders but their are also anti-traders and I don't see anyone saying that by my presence here I am implicitly supporting them.
What as silly statement.Maybe now since there are silly people here I will be labeled a siily supporter.

"And on your question, when Person A gets into a tracker forum they agree to rules of said tracker forum. When Person A then proceeds to ignore said rules and then trades that account to Person B phishes IPs , they violated said rules of the tracker forum.

If the staff here decides someone doesn't get a second chance because of violation of THEIR rules then that is their right to do so".

I don't protect traders I protect an individuals right to privacy trader non-trader,anti-trader,silly person or any name you make up and feel obliged to label someone with.

Christ if you are going to try and crucify me at least do me the courtesy of making a little sense.

I bet every single other user on here understood exactly what idol meant with that IP remark.

He understood it perfectly well .It just didn't fit his agenda.

[Bad-Day]

someone wants cfs

me? i dont want it,man..im just curious and asking..dunno why you would come up with that..
sorry bumrocks for off-topic..this is the last time..

not u

[pretend]

lol: that was fast) sorry for oftopic, don't mind this post

[ghurka]

It doesn't seem that we know the exact circumstances of what went on here - was this done for a specific site and were only certain traders targeted?

There are some traders here who seem to flaunt the trading in the faces of the tracker staff and trading to them seems to be purely for the buzz....sort of "catch me if you can". Personally I don't see anything wrong with getting rid of that type of scum out of the trackers and if it means resorting to underhand tactics then that's how it has to be.

On the other hand if its just a case of catching a trader, any trader, even one doing it for the first time, then that is a different story. Big fish yes....little fish no.

Sometimes the end justifies the means.

Maybe bumrocks could expand a little more on what went on and as far as the DPs go if it is simply to get back pm privileges and not for the purpose of accessing the trade section then I don't see anything wrong with that.

Idol - is there an actual rule here about baiting traders or is it simply an unwritten rule? Not that I'm going to go dangling my rod out there.

[Patriot foreve]

Taste what you have made,you caused harm to alot others in here ,if you can undo what you have done to those members then perhaps they could forgive you

[IdolEyes787]

Idol - is there an actual rule here about baiting traders or is it simply an unwritten rule? Not that I'm going to go dangling my rod out there.

The only rules are the rules that you see listed.I believe baiting would fall under the scamming part ,the irony of which is not lost on me.
Just my interpretation of course .