@efegimitch
It is just a pretty unknown site. Over a year old.
According to post 1 rarity is related to how easy it is to get in. Since it was open sign up till yesterday and every user has a LOT of invites, invites are not rare.
ATM its a actually closed because there are no sign ups and invites are broken.
So momentarily invites rarity might jump to 4/5.
@kajoon
No, I will not get banned![]()
Last edited by Hermiod; 04-26-2007 at 10:32 AM.
kajoon theGFT was open yesterday!!
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
anyone can do areview about Shared.cl ? its unknown foreign tracker, i just got invited and its great, lots of torrents
you can blow me...
I was curious, has anyone ever suggested doing the levels like this?
Only up to 5 levels, but in the site rankings thing "(10)" you give it a rate of 1 to 10.
example
Level 5
ScT(10), ftn(10), u*-t(3)
was just curious. The new level is a bit stretched out, but as someone said earlier, it's a cleaner layout, not cluttered. In any case, nice job and keep up the good work![]()
Last edited by stets619; 04-26-2007 at 05:02 PM. Reason: oops, forgot a ")"
I think HDBits should go higher, it's inredibly difficult to just send invite and then it took for me and hour to register.
I think FTWR should be in Level 9 i don't think Sct is better than it Also FTWR is more rare than Sct every one can Notice that![]()
Yes FTWR is rarer than SCT, and I think that it should be removed compltelty from the list along with UK-T, I havent seen anyone trade either of these sites. Also I think the rating should be based on an average of content and rarity not just rarity because it is misleading, because FTWR and UKT offer shit in content compared to sites like SCT. Having UKT and FTWR grouped with ScT and FTN is just ridiculous, they might be rare, but so what if they dont offer shit in return what's the point of wanting them - Ibet if you lowered both of thoes sites many people would eventually stop wanting them because they know they are crap LOL.
Last edited by KRink; 04-27-2007 at 06:46 AM.
Bookmarks