What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings] Part 1

**supper** · 05-20-2007, 03:56 PM

Originally Posted by taba

Originally Posted by WannaTrade

demands on FTN more than TT..

yes
and 200g in ftn isnt that easy

u can upload on ftn 200gb lets say in 2 month or 3 or 4 but TT its 50 weeks

for sure TT is harder now then before

V · 05-20-2007, 04:29 PM

yeah it's harder than before
but there's no demands for TT as FTN..

**nirvana_522** · 05-20-2007, 05:20 PM

Originally Posted by hungdob

FB is one of the easiest sites to get invites, u dont need to be a pu just upload some gb's and ask in their forums

hmmm ... Its not that powerful content there... so ... y it ranked at level 6 ?
cuz czone and Linko have gr8 content than fb

**mbucari1** · 05-20-2007, 06:41 PM

I think the tracker rating on oink should be a 10. They have the best content IMO, and if it wasn't so damn hard to seed, I'd use for most everything.

**enjoy_with_me** · 05-20-2007, 07:52 PM

Originally Posted by mbucari1

I think the tracker rating on oink should be a 10. They have the best content IMO, and if it wasn't so damn hard to seed, I'd use for most everything.

agreed , also Kg must be at least 9 (Regarding Speciality)

**mikechrobot** · 05-20-2007, 08:25 PM

i would just like to say that i think oink is a bad tracker, there's lots of content, but speeds are bad, little leechers, ok maybe they have rare music, but if u don't want that then you totally don't need oink and have many other good music trackers to choose from

**Night0wl** · 05-20-2007, 08:29 PM

I don't think any general music tracker should be rated too high. If you are really into music then you will have a hard time finding lots of stuff on OiNK.

I wouldn't agree on it being a bad tracker though. Even if there is only one seed on a torrent and you get bad speeds, you can still be almost sure that the one seed will continue seeding until you get the torrent.