What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings] Part 1

**Xtremist** · 09-03-2007, 04:35 PM

Well to answer ur question.I do know its rare.But just think of anyone trading their ScT for one!

well I cant.

**solaris** · 09-03-2007, 04:41 PM

PWT should go up they have closed signups and only PU have only 3 invites given and they will not get them again once used

**zagor** · 09-03-2007, 04:43 PM

Originally Posted by indian

Well to answer ur question.I do know its rare.But just think of anyone trading their ScT for one!

well I cant.

I agree

No one will do that, even him!

**saulin** · 09-03-2007, 05:02 PM

Many of you confuse quality with rarity.

Example. ScT, TL, SCC are simply awesome but are not as rare as other trackers like E**** or FTWR or TT.

Some Hungarian trackers can be rare but the demand is not high. The same with AOM, however it doesn't matter how crappy a tracker is. It can be rare and be side by side with great trackers.

Face it. The rarity rating system is a joke if you want to rate trackers. To compare trackers, put them in separate groups according to what they offer and rate their content/speed.

People that trade are usually morons anyways. Trading rarely gets you the best trackers and chances of accounts being disabled are huge. But people that trade according to the rarity rating system are the biggest morons imo.

Most trackers need fresh reviews so that people can see what they offer and the real rating on speed/content/pre. Then the rating on [bracket] an be more accurate too.... and people should start paying more attention to that rating.

**_coder_** · 09-03-2007, 05:09 PM

Originally Posted by saulin

Many of you confuse quality with rarity.

Example. ScT, TL, SCC are simply awesome but are not as rare as other trackers like E**** or FTWR or TT.

Some Hungarian trackers can be rare but the demand is not high. The same with AOM, however it doesn't matter how crappy a tracker is. It can be rare and be side by side with great trackers.

Face it. The rarity rating system is a joke if you want to rate trackers. To compare trackers, put them in separate groups according to what they offer and rate their content/speed.

People that trade are usually morons anyways. Trading rarely gets you the best trackers and chances of accounts being disabled are huge. But people that trade according to the rarity rating system are the biggest morons imo.

Most trackers need fresh reviews so that people can see what they offer and the real rating on speed/content/pre. Then the rating on [bracket] an be more accurate too.... and people should start paying more attention to that rating.

Valid Point Made ..

+1

**dragos** · 09-03-2007, 05:09 PM

the rating by rarity is perfect. I said it before, in real life you can look at collectors. A very rare one of a kind painting costs milions and milions of dollars, it doesn't matter that the painting itself consists in 3 lines and a dead dog. The fact that there is a single copy of that painting and it has the name of i dont know what faimous paintor is enough to rate it at 20 milions lets say. The same is with trackers. Tl is good , SCC is good ,Rev TT is good , their all good. But you can find them growing in trees. uk-t however, ofcourse it has far more value than everyone else, it's truly a privilege to have it .It's like a tarcker reserved for a restricted class of individuals. So there's no point in bashing the rarity rating , because it's the only good way for trading. If you just want a good tracker for personal use , hey TL/Rev TT/SCC is enough for anyone