What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings] Part 1

[marksman]

Poor SweDVDr.. He's lonley

funny, you just repeated me a page back

its not a funny posts competition..

[0Ri0N]

We still dont no what "+" means. We can only make logical guesses. Any staff member care to explain.

"+" means that a tracker worths more than actual position, but not enough to move it to next level. For example, TT worths 7.5.

[Patriot foreve]

To avoid the conflicts a (+) sign means that the current tarcker is slightly higher than the rest in the same level but it doesn't have enough rarity power yet to reach for the next higher one

For NB ,1000+ invites were given by the staff to NB members and for the record ,NB invites are mainly tradrd through pm's taht's why u don't usually see them floating ,Vidde also have been giving some free invites lately to some good members (don't pm him as that may lower your chances of getting an invite but if i believe if he sees that you are someone who really wanna the tracker to use you may be rewarded one )

For AOM ,well not many trade it in here but if u saw most of the traders u will see some willing to give lvl 8 for it or asking for very high if they have it and wanna trade it so i belive it's current position is ok

[Lizard King]

Great move Patriot. IMO PT should also has + and maybe oink.
IMO we should also make - e.g. for FTWR, Bithumen

[morenoy]

+ again????????????????????
isnt it the reason that we moved to 10 rating system?

[FACE_TO_FACE]

In my opinion must Ts-Tracker go up.

[smirnoff]

why PirateBits isn't on the list
great Swidish site

[nbo]

on one hand hes right, you might as well make 20 levels (im not serious, of course 20 is 2 much)
but on the other hand, most tracker above level 5-6 cant be place in the exact same rarity level.
take czone for an exampy (was level6, is now 6+ or 6.5).
the only other tracker that is level 6 is bitmetv, now czone is worth more than bitmetv, but less than lets say sct which is level 7.
but that is just an example off the top of my head, i still think czone specificly should go to level 7, cuz it fits there a lot better.

[Kyl3KK]

Great move Patriot. IMO PT should also has + and maybe oink.
IMO we should also make - e.g. for FTWR, Bithumen

Minus for FTWR? Why? No one gets into that place from here unless you're willing to trade seedbox axx maybe...

[Daniel]

on one hand hes right, you might as well make 20 levels (im not serious, of course 20 is 2 much)
but on the other hand, most tracker above level 5-6 cant be place in the exact same rarity level.
take czone for an exampy (was level6, is now 6+ or 6.5).
the only other tracker that is level 6 is bitmetv, now czone is worth more than bitmetv, but less than lets say sct which is level 7.
but that is just an example off the top of my head, i still think czone specificly should go to level 7, cuz it fits there a lot better.

There's always the idea to dismiss rating the top trackers in form of levels but do a top 10 list instead.


But what I really wanted to say (totally unrelated): I would feel good about some basic rules on what can and should happen to trackers when they change levels. The vast differences on how trackers are handled in similar situations have often been mentioned and I don't see any possible reasons why tracker A should be judged differently than tracker B after invites are given out, taken away, signups opened or closed, etc. Make up a ruleset and handle all trackers fairly, then at least some discussion in this thread will become gratuitous.