What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings] Part 1

**Shadowfire** · 03-16-2007, 06:12 PM

i think that's wrong.. rarity is one thing but the level that a tracker has should consider the rarity and the number of requests for it. If you don't agree then explain to me why FileFight (now AOM) was level 3 about two months ago.. FF had a database of only 500 users and i bet 90% of them didn't even know any forum to trade they're accounts or simply didn't want to. Basiclly FF was super-mega rare but there was no requests for it so it was only level 3.

I completely agree. Rarity has to do with offers and demands. Therefore, even though how good the tracker doesn't directly affect its rarity, but it directly affects its demand. No matter how little the trackers' invites/accounts are available, it means nothing if nobody wants it.

**Ultramorpg** · 03-16-2007, 08:19 PM

Originally Posted by Tk2011

Originally Posted by Ultramorpg

People wanting the tracker or not has nothing to do with rarity... Maybe if there were offers but nobody taking them you would have a point (and that's why I said trades/OFFERS).

It's just not reasonable that a lvl5 tracker has more users-traffic/offers/trades than a 4.5, it doesn't make any sense.

i think that's wrong.. rarity is one thing but the level that a tracker has should consider the rarity and the number of requests for it. If you don't agree then explain to me why FileFight (now AOM) was level 3 about two months ago.. FF had a database of only 500 users and i bet 90% of them didn't even know any forum to trade they're accounts or simply didn't want to. Basiclly FF was super-mega rare but there was no requests for it so it was only level 3.

When I found out about FF I made 3 accounts in 2 days. It's true it had only 500 users, but it was damn easy to signup, sth like TB. Besides, this list does not reflect the actual reality, it's not flawless in any way.

I think that your idea is cool anyway, but the levels we are handling now are about rarity, and I base my opinion in rarity and only rarity. If things are to be done like you say we should clarify that before and the list should suffer MAJOR changes

**Tk2011** · 03-16-2007, 08:47 PM

Originally Posted by Ultramorpg

When I found out about FF I made 3 accounts in 2 days. It's true it had only 500 users, but it was damn easy to signup, sth like TB. Besides, this list does not reflect the actual reality, it's not flawless in any way.
I think that your idea is cool anyway, but the levels we are handling now are about rarity, and I base my opinion in rarity and only rarity. If things are to be done like you say we should clarify that before and the list should suffer MAJOR changes

Well i didn't know FF had open signups but when i got my account it was fully closed and still level 3 so rarity wasn't helping the tracker to grow to a higher level.
My idea?! It's not an idea, it's how things normally works around here. It doesn't matter if the tracker has a small database of users because it will be a lower level if no one is looking for it.
If there is some tracker out there with only a 50 users database but wants it, then it should be lower level.. sure it's rare to find a user with an account there but why should it be high level? once again i remeber the FF example.

V · 03-16-2007, 08:51 PM

NB should go up to 4.5

**OmaRin0** · 03-16-2007, 09:15 PM

Originally Posted by WannaTrade

NB should go up to 4.5

they were giving away free accounts...

**taba** · 03-16-2007, 09:46 PM

Originally Posted by OmaRin0

Originally Posted by WannaTrade

NB should go up to 4.5

they were giving away free accounts..

NOT THAT MUCH if compared with demand

and it isnt given to every 1 like wb or czone
it is given with very restricted conditions

any way am happy to get mine b4 and will never trade it out