We get harshly treated because England invented football hooliganism.![]()
We get harshly treated because England invented football hooliganism.![]()
You're not the best at that either.Originally posted by N£MO@15 October 2003 - 21:26
We get harshly treated because England invented football hooliganism.![]()
You're not the best at that either. [/b][/quote]Originally posted by JPaul+15 October 2003 - 20:29--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (JPaul @ 15 October 2003 - 20:29)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-N£MO@15 October 2003 - 21:26
We get harshly treated because England invented football hooliganism.![]()
That is a matter of opinion.
i always say this sukur is shit hes a wanker i hate himOriginally posted by JPaul@15 October 2003 - 20:11
I thought Beckham coped really well with the way he was treated.
Alpay at the penalty and at half time. Tugay's tackle which was 20 minutes late. The wee prick who elbowed him in the ribs when the referee was looking the other way.
He did a great job of keeping his head, when it was obvious they were trying to goad him into getting sent off. That was their only tactic.
I can't see us getting thro' against Holland. However I can guarentee that the fans will have a party and will get on with the other supporters. Home and away.
I'd rather have a shit team with great supporters and a great reputation Rather than have a successful team like Turkey, with the worst reputation for cheating and the biggest scum fans in the world.
Oh and the penalty claim by Sucker (I think) didn't I say - "diving cheats". Their behaviour was not at all surprising, tho' depressing none the less.
as for alpay apart from making beckham cry he was brilliant in defence
I'd love to contribute to this thread but I'll only be accused of being a racist.
Dont dis the Headhunters ! Shhhhhh ! Secret Site.Originally posted by 3rd gen noob@15 October 2003 - 19:19
if it weren't for the chelsea head-hunting scum attacking scottish fans last night, i'd totally agree
Are you a racist then. If not why would you be accused of being one.Originally posted by namzuf9@15 October 2003 - 22:01
I'd love to contribute to this thread but I'll only be accused of being a racist.
Nah I was just in the mood for turk bashing!![]()
Not to hijack this thread but.....
If someone uses the term turk or scot it is not considered to be a racial slur but if I was to use the word p*ki (probaly just a english thing, I dont know) it would be deemed racist. Are the names not both a shortening of their country of origin? (sorry for the off topic but I was having this discussion today and got called a racist)
calling someone a p*ki would be nationalist, not racist...the debate is a matter of semantics and definitions...
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
Thats my point entirely. Definition. How do you define a racist word?Originally posted by 3rd gen noob@15 October 2003 - 22:03
calling someone a p*ki would be nationalist, not racist...the debate is a matter of semantics and definitions...
Bookmarks