-
Poster
Norton antivirus corporate 8.1 is hard to find. Is it ok if I just install the 7.6 version?
-
-
10-12-2003, 04:15 AM
Software & Hardware -
#2
Poster
Why wouldn't it be ok?
-
-
10-12-2003, 04:22 AM
Software & Hardware -
#3
Retired
Even though I recommend 8.1, installing 7.6 would still be good as long as you continue to update your virus definitions.
-
-
10-12-2003, 04:25 AM
Software & Hardware -
#4
Poster
Check your PM box leonidas. Sent you a link that dinner123 passed on to me (he originally got it from shareholder) and a few others.
-
-
10-12-2003, 05:32 AM
Software & Hardware -
#5
Poster
proud to be american
-
-
10-12-2003, 07:00 AM
Software & Hardware -
#6
-
-
10-12-2003, 11:08 AM
Software & Hardware -
#7
Poster
Im on NAV2004 @ 2.4GhZ 1GB RAM.
Nothing rong here.
-
-
10-12-2003, 11:23 AM
Software & Hardware -
#8
Poster
Originally posted by Jay@12 October 2003 - 05:32
let me get that too
check your PM's Jay
-
-
10-12-2003, 01:43 PM
Software & Hardware -
#9
Poster
Norton Corporate's popularity is being boosted after many people claim that Norton AntiVirus 2004 Professional is a "resource-hog", I'm running it on a system with an Pentium 4 2.0GHz Processor, with 256MB of PC133 SDRAM, and it's fine.
-
-
10-12-2003, 01:52 PM
Software & Hardware -
#10
Poster
Originally posted by Amarjit@12 October 2003 - 13:43
Norton Corporate's popularity is being boosted after many people claim that Norton AntiVirus 2004 Professional is a "resource-hog", I'm running it on a system with an Pentium 4 2.0GHz Processor, with 256MB of PC133 SDRAM, and it's fine.
all norton anti virus's slow down your comp, with the exception of corp! ive ran 2003 pro on my amd xp 2000+, with 1gb of DDR Pc2700 RAM, slowed it down soooo much!
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks