I think what is misunderstood here more than anything is he considered himself both a member and a mod, many people said "how can you say that, what kind of mod are you", which he responded that he should be allowed to have opinions like anyone else, I kinda agree... [/b][/quote]Originally posted by REALITY+12 October 2003 - 13:00--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (REALITY @ 12 October 2003 - 13:00)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Adster@12 October 2003 - 12:53
I was being serious he used to let threads go when they shoudl have been locked while he spamed them himself with cookie pics pretty stars ect yes its funny but that shouldn't come from a mod it shoudl come from a member
From what I could tell, jetje was the typical mod in making sure an offense is in the rules to do any action about it, while balamm had a merc/maverick style of not pussy-footing about things and stopping the BS right there and then.
Both styles have its own strengths (as well as weaknesses), but personally I liked the maverick style modding anyway
Also seems that while jetje understood that as a mod he had to keep his own opinion out of the board and be neutral in most cases, balamm didn't seem to want to lose that opinion and tried to be (as REALITY said) a mod and a member.
Considering the conflicting styles of these two mods, I'm surprised the conflict didn't start from balamm's first mod dayBut I have to admit that I preferred balamm's style, even though it might not have been as beneficial to the board
![]()
Bookmarks