Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 51

Thread: XBNox 360 or Ps3..?

  1. #21
    SonsOfLiberty's Avatar The Lonely Wanderer
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Capital Wasteland
    Posts
    19,213
    Quote Originally Posted by andy316 View Post
    get the Wii!!you will have great fun with your friends, family, children, grandpa, maid, butler,etc playing mario all day,the most "exclusive" content out there

    and its quite cheap
    Most exclusive content for people under 10 and people older than 40 Not a huge demographic there, well it is, but gamers like me, sort of laugh off the Wii, there are some fun games, but please, ffs give me a controller, I hate the motion thing.
    [center]

  2. Games   -   #22
    dette's Avatar The Young Tech Geek
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska
    Age
    32
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by SonsOfLiberty View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by andy316 View Post
    get the Wii!!you will have great fun with your friends, family, children, grandpa, maid, butler,etc playing mario all day,the most "exclusive" content out there

    and its quite cheap
    Most exclusive content for people under 10 and people older than 40 Not a huge demographic there, well it is, but gamers like me, sort of laugh off the Wii, there are some fun games, but please, ffs give me a controller, I hate the motion thing.
    I mostly agree here haha.. The Wii is one FUN machine though.. Would I get one? No likely not! I want some high detail and graphical games. Mature games too haha. The Wii is fun for Mario, Super Smash Bros, and some others.. Very fun but not hardcore gaming. I will give him the fact that the Wii does have a lot of exclusives haha
    Last edited by dette; 12-11-2009 at 04:56 AM.
    Gaming Laptop: Windows 7 Ultimate > ASUSTek G50vt Mobo > nVidia GeForce 9800M GS 512mb > Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz > 4GB RAM > 320GB SATA HDD

    Custom Desktop: Mac 0S X 10.5.8 > nVidia nForce 4 SLI Mobo GA-K8N > nVidia GeForce 6600 256mb > AMD Athlon 64 3000+ 1.8GHz > 1.5GB RAM > 250GB SATA HDD

  3. Games   -   #23
    Poster BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    84
    lol i was jk there..never thought u people might take a bit serious and would think i was in with the exclusives..oh well

    but in more serious terms,get the xbox.Why?more games,has one of the better online multiplayer functionalities of the two consoles,and besides,you would not get any lag whatsoever on Live..the only problem i would say is the annoying red ring/other failures which u can get very easily within a few months,its here where the xbox lacks while the ps3 has none of this...

  4. Games   -   #24
    7th's Avatar the brazilian guy BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    São Paulo
    Posts
    802
    Quote Originally Posted by dette View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by 7th View Post

    That's a trap man! If you get both, you won't return any uhauahuah
    Hahahaha then what do I do!?!?
    GOSH MAN! Stop doing hard questions!

    Quote Originally Posted by andy316 View Post
    but in more serious terms,get the xbox.Why?more games,has one of the better online multiplayer functionalities of the two consoles,and besides,you would not get any lag whatsoever on Live..
    I'm not a multiplayer fan, don't play a lot online so I can't compare live vs psn but... my brother does play a lot online. By what I hear, Live is better in many ways... by what I see, Live presents a lot of lags (here in Brazil) and I've never seen a Xbox game that people can play with up to 60 players online (30 vs 30)... is that too much of a mess? You can bet it is, but it's a lot of a fun haha! But was two weeks ago that I got really impressed... a FPS called MAG stores up to 256 players online. They are divided into two groups of 128 players and then subdivided into 8 squads of 16 players each. But each group has a mission and they work all together to achieve it, all at the same time in a BIG map.... with no lag.

    It's crazy =/
    Last edited by 7th; 12-11-2009 at 12:16 PM.

  5. Games   -   #25
    Poster BT Rep: +7BT Rep +7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    507
    For SoL and those with both, why does PSN suck?

    I have only the PS3. All my friends have 360 and are on Live and it seems the only advantage is the amount of people. I didn't want to play with a bunch of them, because they sit around playing all day and chatting. When I game, it's me time and I turn off the voip actually. But PSN seems fine in terms of connectability and stability, plus there are plenty of people to play (around 250k on MW2 during peak hours), the things that really matter.

  6. Games   -   #26
    Poster BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    84
    Quote Originally Posted by 7th View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by dette View Post

    Hahahaha then what do I do!?!?
    GOSH MAN! Stop doing hard questions!

    Quote Originally Posted by andy316 View Post
    but in more serious terms,get the xbox.Why?more games,has one of the better online multiplayer functionalities of the two consoles,and besides,you would not get any lag whatsoever on Live..
    I'm not a multiplayer fan, don't play a lot online so I can't compare live vs psn but... my brother does play a lot online. By what I hear, Live is better in many ways... by what I see, Live presents a lot of lags (here in Brazil) and I've never seen a Xbox game that people can play with up to 60 players online (30 vs 30)... is that too much of a mess? You can bet it is, but it's a lot of a fun haha! But was two weeks ago that I got really impressed... a FPS called MAG stores up to 256 players online. They are divided into two groups of 128 players and then subdivided into 8 squads of 16 players each. But each group has a mission and they work all together to achieve it, all at the same time in a BIG map.... with no lag.

    It's crazy =/
    i know man,its just crazy u can play that much of players in one map..i don't know what black magic the developer or Sony has done that its possible to do it all in a console..let alone PC

  7. Games   -   #27
    dette's Avatar The Young Tech Geek
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska
    Age
    32
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by andy316 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by 7th View Post

    GOSH MAN! Stop doing hard questions!

    Quote Originally Posted by andy316 View Post
    but in more serious terms,get the xbox.Why?more games,has one of the better online multiplayer functionalities of the two consoles,and besides,you would not get any lag whatsoever on Live..
    I'm not a multiplayer fan, don't play a lot online so I can't compare live vs psn but... my brother does play a lot online. By what I hear, Live is better in many ways... by what I see, Live presents a lot of lags (here in Brazil) and I've never seen a Xbox game that people can play with up to 60 players online (30 vs 30)... is that too much of a mess? You can bet it is, but it's a lot of a fun haha! But was two weeks ago that I got really impressed... a FPS called MAG stores up to 256 players online. They are divided into two groups of 128 players and then subdivided into 8 squads of 16 players each. But each group has a mission and they work all together to achieve it, all at the same time in a BIG map.... with no lag.

    It's crazy =/
    i know man,its just crazy u can play that much of players in one map..i don't know what black magic the developer or Sony has done that its possible to do it all in a console..let alone PC
    Yes that is absolutely insane! Would be SO much fun though! Especially with a headset
    Gaming Laptop: Windows 7 Ultimate > ASUSTek G50vt Mobo > nVidia GeForce 9800M GS 512mb > Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz > 4GB RAM > 320GB SATA HDD

    Custom Desktop: Mac 0S X 10.5.8 > nVidia nForce 4 SLI Mobo GA-K8N > nVidia GeForce 6600 256mb > AMD Athlon 64 3000+ 1.8GHz > 1.5GB RAM > 250GB SATA HDD

  8. Games   -   #28
    SonsOfLiberty's Avatar The Lonely Wanderer
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Capital Wasteland
    Posts
    19,213
    Quote Originally Posted by TrollinThunder View Post
    For SoL and those with both, why does PSN suck?

    I have only the PS3. All my friends have 360 and are on Live and it seems the only advantage is the amount of people. I didn't want to play with a bunch of them, because they sit around playing all day and chatting. When I game, it's me time and I turn off the voip actually. But PSN seems fine in terms of connectability and stability, plus there are plenty of people to play (around 250k on MW2 during peak hours), the things that really matter.
    Get a 360 and even with Silver account, just play around on Live you will see the setup/design/everything about Live out classes PSN....PS3 is really only good for less than 10 good games and bluray right now, as the 360 has loads and loads of games...remember 360 started this whole DLC for consoles and get the DLC's almost always first and PSN will be lucky to get em' eg...Fallout 3 DLC's PSN owners had to wait for a year to get em'. Oh yeah I forgot I can play as the jOker in Batman, that was my reason for buying a PS3, not

    Peak hours for MW2 is only that much? Live will double or triple that, I that's from a guy who HATES playing online no really I do hate it I'm a single player guy.
    Last edited by SonsOfLiberty; 12-12-2009 at 12:48 AM.
    [center]

  9. Games   -   #29
    dette's Avatar The Young Tech Geek
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska
    Age
    32
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by SonsOfLiberty View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TrollinThunder View Post
    For SoL and those with both, why does PSN suck?

    I have only the PS3. All my friends have 360 and are on Live and it seems the only advantage is the amount of people. I didn't want to play with a bunch of them, because they sit around playing all day and chatting. When I game, it's me time and I turn off the voip actually. But PSN seems fine in terms of connectability and stability, plus there are plenty of people to play (around 250k on MW2 during peak hours), the things that really matter.
    Get a 360 and even with Silver account, just play around on Live you will see the setup/design/everything about Live out classes PSN....PS3 is really only good for less than 10 good games and bluray right now, as the 360 has loads and loads of games...remember 360 started this whole DLC for consoles and get the DLC's almost always first and PSN will be lucky to get em' eg...Fallout 3 DLC's PSN owners had to wait for a year to get em'. Oh yeah I forgot I can play as the jOker in Batman, that was my reason for buying a PS3, not

    Peak hours for MW2 is only that much? Live will double or triple that, I that's from a guy who HATES playing online no really I do hate it I'm a single player guy.
    Ive played my friends PS3 many many times, PSN is still good, Live just tops it haha. The Blu Ray and a lot of the little features on the PS3 are really good. But the actual GAMES and Online Play is better on Xbox definitely
    Last edited by dette; 12-12-2009 at 08:51 AM.
    Gaming Laptop: Windows 7 Ultimate > ASUSTek G50vt Mobo > nVidia GeForce 9800M GS 512mb > Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz > 4GB RAM > 320GB SATA HDD

    Custom Desktop: Mac 0S X 10.5.8 > nVidia nForce 4 SLI Mobo GA-K8N > nVidia GeForce 6600 256mb > AMD Athlon 64 3000+ 1.8GHz > 1.5GB RAM > 250GB SATA HDD

  10. Games   -   #30
    category6's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    in more advanced world
    Posts
    98
    xbox is cheaper
    and you can burn pirated game for it
    it's the best

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •