Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Security Firm: Windows 7 Less Secure Than Vista

  1. #1
    Darth Sushi's Avatar Sushi Lord
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Corisant
    Posts
    5,532
    Security Firm: Windows 7 Less Secure Than Vista
    by Marcus Yam, December 11, 2009

    " Despite the marketing push, Microsoft developers do not try to hide the fact that Windows 7 is an extension of efforts made for Windows Vista.

    Windows 7 fixed or improved many of the things people didn't like about Windows Vista, but Raimund Genes, CTO of security firm Trend Micro, has found something that he much preferred in the earlier OS.

    Genes said that Microsoft made design decisions this time around that sacrificed security in the interest of usability, mostly because of Microsoft dialing back User Account Control (UAC).

    "I'm not saying Windows 7 is insecure, but out of the box Vista is better," Genes told The Register.

    "I was disappointed when I first used a Windows 7 machine that there was no warning that I had no anti-virus, unlike Vista," Genes said. "There are no file extension hidden warnings either. Even when you do install anti-virus, warnings that it has not been updated are almost invisible."

    "Windows 7 may be an improvement in terms of useability but in terms of security it's a mistake, though one that isn't that surprising. When Microsoft's developers choose between usability and security, they will always choose useability," Genes argued. "

    Source: http://www.tomshardware.com/news/win...-uac,9251.html

  2. News (Archive)   -   #2
    Rart's Avatar Hold The Line
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,826
    First people complain that Vista is too intrusive, and now they complain it isn't intrusive enough.

    I guess you can never satisfy some people

  3. News (Archive)   -   #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Sushi View Post
    Security Firm: Windows 7 Less Secure Than Vista
    by Marcus Yam, December 11, 2009

    "I was disappointed when I first used a Windows 7 machine that there was no warning that I had no anti-virus, unlike Vista,"
    The issue is that you need one in the first place. Any new o/s should not require you to buy or even use free third party software just to keep your computer usable.

  4. News (Archive)   -   #4
    The computer is usable without these added benefits that people have become spoiled with and taken for granted. I like not having all the extra crap so that I can make my own decisions about what I want. If you're complaining that it doesn't come with it and you are not smart enough to check, then you deserve to get viruses. And you don't get warnings that the virus software isn't updated?? Why is this Microsoft's fault and not the fault of ... say, Norton or McAfee or whoever else? Now, I am anti-Microsoft on most levels, but come on now... a security expert is claiming that the software isn't usable because it doesn't come preinstalled with a program? Shut up and install one yourself... maybe they were issued an injunction or are trying to avoid one a la Internet Explorer.
    Post something relevant that adds value, or keep yer trap shut like you was avoidin a sistaboy in prison.

  5. News (Archive)   -   #5
    ..... BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    3,356
    Vista was the buggiest OS I ever used. Win7 is way better to me.

  6. News (Archive)   -   #6
    turin's Avatar Turambar BT Rep: +40BT Rep +40BT Rep +40BT Rep +40BT Rep +40BT Rep +40BT Rep +40BT Rep +40
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Middle-earth
    Age
    46
    Posts
    900
    I still prefer XP

  7. News (Archive)   -   #7
    brilman's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    240
    I don't know about everyone else but I wipe out most systems (os) and start fresh anyway. Who really wants all that crap that comes bundled?
    win 7 works fine (so does xp).

    Biggest thing that makes me smile is the point and click that everyone does. (don't read don't do anything but click "ok" then wonder why there systems are all wacked out.

    You would think with all the facebooking and tweeting people would learn to read? guess they need someone els to do that for them too

    I don't know about everyone else but I wipe out most systems (os) and start fresh anyway. Who really wants all that crap that comes bundled?
    win 7 works fine (so does xp).

    Biggest thing that makes me smile is the point and click that everyone does. (don't read don't do anything but click "ok" then wonder why there systems are all wacked out.

    You would think with all the facebooking and tweeting people would learn to read? guess they need someone els to do that for them too
    Last edited by brilman; 12-12-2009 at 03:35 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  8. News (Archive)   -   #8
    Well, that guy just want to scare people so they buy his anti virus software.

  9. News (Archive)   -   #9
    Eros-x's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    76
    The only thing i don't like about windows 7 is that i can't use peerguardian cause it's not licensed or some bs

  10. News (Archive)   -   #10
    mr. nails's Avatar m@D @n!m3 BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    austin, tx
    Posts
    3,553
    WoW. ppl still complaining? i had no problems with XP or Vista. matter of a fact i'm still using Vista and it's working like a champ. i dumped XP 3 years ago and never looked back. lol, brainwashing is fun. "YOU must keep using XP. Vista is the devil!"

    as for Win7. i've installed it on my other pc and it DOES tell you that you don't have an Anti-Virus installed. silly no0bs.
    Alamo Drafthouse!

    Last Game Completed: Aliens: Colonial Marines (PC) 10-13-13
    Now Playing: Paper Mario 64
    Total Games Completed: 503

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •