
Originally Posted by
Rart
And how the hell is this even relevant at all? Trading doesn't break FST rules, so if he was trading this thread wouldn't even be here in the first place.
No one is condoning his actions, so an "even vote" in no way, means that we accept his practices. This "even vote" is simply regarding whether he should stay on FST, after he decided to break the forum rules. The thread, in no way, displays our opinions toward invite selling, simply toward his status as a member here.
So perhaps if you actually sat down for a while and actually thought about what the thread is for, you would realize we weren't "hypocritical fuckheads".
Thank you, have a nice day.
Whilst I dont usually bother to respond, nowhere does it say that he broke the rules of FST. My understanding of the first post is that he was caught being an invite seller(or offerer as the case may be), and those types are not wanted here, and was given a chance to plead his case to be able to stay here. How can it not be about the opinions of invite selling, thats the whole jist of the OP? paraphrasing: " I tried to trade, I got cause by Cabalo (presumably), I was gonna get kicked cause Im a seller, but Cabalo let me plead my case first."
That being said, to answer your question about the "hypocritical fuckheads" part. Trading is frowned upon here, no? Selling is even worse, no? So it follows that the same people who condemn people for trading are letting the OP back onto FST who attempted to sell invites.. which as we agreed is worse than trading.
The point being that why condemn someone for one thing but let them slide for a worse offense.
If I misread or misunderstood the OP due to my 4th grade education, please consider me an illiterate fuckhead.
Bookmarks