Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: M$ OS w/out buying it?

  1. #1
    chinaski's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +6BT Rep +6
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    122

    Question Mark

    I had been using M$ operating systems for years before shifting to Linux two years ago.
    However, sometime I feel the need to install XP for a while - not all the M$-related softwares have an equivalent on GNU/Linux, you know.

    So... I do not have an original Windows OS set, every now & then have to d/l those crappy rips with their "30 days of life".

    The question is: if I want to d/l the closer-pains-free rip of WinXP, what I shall to choose?
    I'm a little bit confused by all those integrated, corporate, home/professional, student and such releases...

    Any suggest? Or have you all a licensed, retail Windows OS?

    Cheers!
    Last edited by chinaski; 12-26-2009 at 10:16 PM.

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #2
    Skiz's Avatar (_8(I)
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    CO
    Age
    48
    Posts
    22,928
    The "corporate" version should always be good. I usually aim for the XP Pro versions.

    What are you going to use to download the software, or what do you have access to and we can better notify you of what's available to you? Bittorrent? Usenet? Other?

    Also, is there any reason why you want XP over 7?

    EDIT: This one I have used twice for friends' computers.

    Microsoft.Windows.XP.Professional.SP3.Integrated.June.2009.Corporate.Unattended-UP2DATE

    or

    Microsoft.Windows.XP.Professional.SP3.Integrated.June.2009.Corporate-UP2DATE
    Last edited by Skiz; 12-26-2009 at 11:15 PM.


    yo

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #3
    chinaski's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +6BT Rep +6
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by Skiz View Post
    The "corporate" version should always be good. I usually aim for the XP Pro versions.
    Any particular reason?

    Quote Originally Posted by Skiz View Post
    What are you going to use to download the software, or what do you have access to and we can better notify you of what's available to you?
    I prefer torrents, but I don't care about it as we're talking about less than 700 MB ;-)

    Quote Originally Posted by Skiz View Post
    Also, is there any reason why you want XP over 7?
    Hardware limitations, I guess.

    Thanks for replying!

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #4
    Skiz's Avatar (_8(I)
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    CO
    Age
    48
    Posts
    22,928
    I like Pro as it doesn't have all the fluff that "Media Center Edition" has, but offers more than the Home edition and was supposedly faster. (I suppose you could your own comparison if you felt like it.)

    These are versions I have used several times that work just fine.

    Microsoft.Windows.XP.Professional.SP3.Integrated.June.2009.Corporate.Unattended-UP2DATE

    or

    Microsoft.Windows.XP.Professional.SP3.Integrated.June.2009.Corporate-UP2DATE


    yo

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #5
    chinaski's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +6BT Rep +6
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    122
    found several UP2DATE releases [i mean, monthly]: why choose a "june edition" over a "december" one? just curiosity ;-)

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #6
    Skiz's Avatar (_8(I)
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    CO
    Age
    48
    Posts
    22,928
    The "UP2DATE" releases should all be fine.

    I recommended the June release as I've used it and can confirm it works. I'd wager there haven't been any major updates to XP in the past few months tho' so I'd say they are probably comparable. The December one is probably fine.
    Last edited by Skiz; 12-27-2009 at 12:06 AM.


    yo

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #7
    Tv Controls you's Avatar Resistance is Futile BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Land of Hypocrisy
    Posts
    1,266
    Quote Originally Posted by chinaski View Post
    found several UP2DATE releases [i mean, monthly]: why choose a "june edition" over a "december" one? just curiosity ;-)
    Use "Windows XP Performance Edition SP3 December 2009" , its hands down the best edition of windows.

    The guy stripped everything down to its bear bones and has xp running at 32mb of ram!!!! Not even ubuntu can run that low.

    He also takes away unnecessary items that you never use. I have yet to run into something that he took out because they really must have been stupid bloat items.
    I run multiple computers on it and it is flawless. Less glitchy then the windows release if you ask me.

    I have never used a normal release of windows since my first install of performance edition. It makes even the trashiest computers run like gold.

    Some cool features (In my opinion):
    1) only 300mb big!!!! wow
    2) You can burn it to a cd (which is great for lower end systems that don't have a dvd player)
    3) 32mb of ram (come on this is just amazing)
    4) Tons of worthless trash that you have to delete when doing a fresh install is removed!
    5) Alot of fixes built in (such as halfopen connections, and windows themes pre patched)

    Trust me you'll never want to use linux again lol.
    Last edited by Tv Controls you; 12-27-2009 at 04:11 AM.

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #8
    peat moss's Avatar Software Farmer BT Rep: +15BT Rep +15BT Rep +15
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Delta B.C. Canada
    Posts
    10,547
    Quote Originally Posted by Skiz View Post
    The "UP2DATE" releases should all be fine.

    I recommended the June release as I've used it and can confirm it works. I'd wager there haven't been any major updates to XP in the past few months tho' so I'd say they are probably comparable. The December one is probably fine.
    That's the one I just installed but Dec.21 /09

    SCENE GROUP: UP2DATE



    PRODUCT FEATURES:
    - Unattended (Automated Installation)
    - Integrated (Updated with Service Packs, Updates, Patchs, Hotfixes)
    - December 21, 2009 (Date of Integration)
    - Corporate Edition (No Serial/Key Required)
    - Great for Virtual Machines as this is extremely light, fast, and perfect for
    a virtual testing environment
    - Updateable
    - Validates
    - Tested, Verified, Scanned, and can be Confirmed by RudeBoySes
    Last edited by peat moss; 12-27-2009 at 04:02 AM.

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #9
    chinaski's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +6BT Rep +6
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    122
    Thanks to all.
    By the way, it seems to me there's a way to "assemblate" a WinXP release as much as you like like a GNU/Linux distro.
    Isn't it?
    Last edited by chinaski; 12-27-2009 at 04:26 PM.

  10. Software & Hardware   -   #10
    Cabalo's Avatar FileSharingTalker BT Rep: +24BT Rep +24BT Rep +24BT Rep +24BT Rep +24
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    European Union
    Age
    48
    Posts
    11,834
    You mean, stripping down windows components? Nlite for xp, vlite for Vista/7.
    And why the heck you keep referring to that POS winXP ? It's a OS dated from 2001, FFS.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •