Help with What.CD

[Rart]

And you're assuming that everything whatman says is false.

[sez]

^^ I don't know what whatman did to you but its the internet,it would be dumb of him to start from a point of trust going backwards.The right way is the other way around and while it obviously has its small flaws its the best of the two.

^^ 4 tvcy of course not you rart

[ca_aok]

Your assuming everything whatman says is true.

Who has more reason to lie?

In any case, every single time someone comes whining to these forums, the facts are revealed that they have lied not only to the staff of the tracker where they were banned, but also to the forum here in some pathetic plea for sympathy, presumably in hopes that public outcry will get their account reinstated. What people here sometimes forget is on a site of 110K members with 20 people to run the place, it's a full time job and tempers are often stretched, especially by the idiots who wind up in the disabled channel. I've seen firsthand some of the idiocy that has landed former members in that channel in the first place, and I can see why you'd be pissed off after having hundreds of people throw the same lies in your face when caught breaking a rule. With that many members, there will obviously be a greater number of disgruntled cast offs, perpetuating your apparent stereotype that their staff are terrible.

[dackel]

how can i know if all he says is true?
and if you are reffering to

(mostly exposing liars)

,
then look up the threads where the op gets exposed for cheating or creating dupe accounts, gets flamed by other fsters and gets dissapeared.
in this case i believe whatman.
but i tried to make another point with my previous post, it's cool that he takes his time to come to fst and deals with "members in trouble".
i have to add that i don't know what is going on in their irc tho.

[Tv Controls you]

Your assuming everything whatman says is true.

Who has more reason to lie?

It's the truth members on here have more reason to lie than whatman. But also his site is constantly bashed on these forums, and it may be just an attempt to regain credibility.

It is truly alarming how many members will speak out against what.cd as compared to other sites. It should really convey a strong message.

[Cabalo]

Have you ever stopped to think that it might be related to the huge number of members they have there? And the amount of cheaters, traders, sellers and so on that it brings altogether?

And I don't know if we're talking about the same what.cd, but I don't see them being bashed anymore than any very popular site around here. What I do see, are some members who actively engage in criticism, for the simple fact they bother to come explain the situations that happened.
You don't see many trackers doing that, and that's why some try to take advantage of it.

[Tv Controls you]

As I posted earlier the disabled channel admins only come here to defend what.cd. They have no intention of helping anyone on here.

All they do is harass members and expose fabricated private information.

Its almost as if they have not got enough satisfaction from banning people on the disabled channel.
Only thing I can figure is that the disabled channel was empty and they were looking for a battle.

I mean they literally have no other posts besides those incriminating disabled what.cd members......

I really don't have a major problem with whatman as he isn't the disabled channel admins and he has proven to be helpful on the forums.
But for the own good of his site he should look into new staff members to breathe life in to their slowly corrupting disabled channel.

[BobFromAccounting]

As I posted earlier the disabled channel admins only come here to defend what.cd. They have no intention of helping anyone on here.

All they do is harass members and expose fabricated private information.

Its almost as if they have not got enough satisfaction from banning people on the disabled channel.
Only thing I can figure is that the disabled channel was empty and they were looking for a battle.

I mean they literally have no other posts besides those incriminating disabled what.cd members......

I really don't have a major problem with whatman as he isn't the disabled channel admins and he has proven to be helpful on the forums.
But for the own good of his site he should look into new staff members to breathe life in to their slowly corrupting disabled channel.

I'm sorry, but to be frank, who are you to say that such information is fabricated? Do you have access to the information they do? No. Were you there in the channel? No. The guy even admitted to having made a second account, which is against their rules and a banable offense in the first place.

I'm not kissing any ass here but honestly it seems you have some sort of personal vendetta against the place.

I mean they literally have no other posts besides those incriminating disabled what.cd members......

Have you ever considered the only people who would generally have to resort to these means are those that were already told no in the disabled channel? People get re-enabled there every day, just because every once in awhile an unhappy 'customer' decides to stir things up and throw in the sympathy plea doesn't mean they're bad at what they do.

Think of it this way - you order something from Newegg (Or any other online store that allows commenting and rating) If you get the item and you're happy with it, you might be one of those few that go and post some positive feedback, but most people don't bother doing that. Now lets say you get the item and it doesn't work, or you simply dislike it, well there's an exponentially higher chance you're going to go post a negative comment with a horrible rating as soon as you can.

In sum - You're more likely to hear from people with bad feedback than those with good. You don't see members of any site posting here thanking people for being re-enabled after visiting the support channel, but you do see people whining about being denied.

[Cabalo]

@TVCY: Well, for your information, I've just been relayed (2 mins ago) a IRC convo between one of the admins, padutch, and a user who went ask why his invites were removed. It happens the person he invited was a cheater. The user was pretty civil, and so did padutch.
As I said before, it all comes down how people handle when under pressure, especially the members who were infracted.

By the way, if proven that the member in question indeed cheated, he isn't accessing any longer any invites or trades here.

[7th]

[QUOTE=Karid;3371378]It seems you have some sort of personal vendetta against the place.[quote]

I don't know what a personal vendetta is but you're probably right about that

@TCY: all my respect to you man, BUT... you generalize too much for my taste... what you're doing here can't be fair...

how many staffs they have at what.cd? 1? 2? No, maybe they have more! Maybe they have like 3 staff members and two of them treated you in a pushy way and the third one is whatman, the one you like, am I right? If I'm not, so you can't say the what.cd staff is crap man

if a tracker staff think a user did something wrong, he won't be (and shouldn't be) nice to this user until he proves the contrary... (edit: as cabalo just said hehe) the staff need to put users under "high pressure" to test them... came on! this is internet and they can't look into your eyes to see if you're telling the truth... well, maybe with webcams