Help with What.CD

[Tv Controls you]

7th i guess your right.... I'm talking about nightoath, n0nam3, and xavier in particular. Basically the whole disabled channel administration that joined here.

*edited* Not trying to start a big fight removed second half. Night FST

[7th]

7th i guess your right.... I'm talking about nightoath, n0nam3, and xavier in particular. Basically the whole disabled channel administration that joined here.

What.cd didn't give me a chance as I remember it (6-8 months ago), why should I post positively about them when I was treated wrong.

well, I said all that thinking of 2 things:

first: I had problems in a tracker (bitme) for inviting people that turned out to be cheaters... all my invites were taken out and without knowing why I went to the irc to ask about my invites...

think about someone very angry (the bitme staff that day ) and a user completely lost (me that didn't know about the cheaters)... In the end they were nice to let me stay (but no more invites, just a small price to stay I would say) and I've learned a lesson...

now, what I'm trying to say is that I had the option to go to their IRC "demanding" () my invites back (still without knowing about the invitees) or even get mad for what I've heard that day and just get banned for my posture...

second: thinking of BCG and two different staffs I see there... stoi and the other one I forgot the nick ... stoi is the "lovely" and "soft" guy we all know, and the other one is that well know for his "hard heart", the one who bans people for "so little" or whatever... well, I would say that BCG works well because we have a little bit of both you know?

It would be a mess if we had like 10 stois there and it would be unbearable if we had only of the other staff (hope I don't get banned for this )

ps: I'm sure you had a lot of chances to amend things with what.cd staff but instead you keep pushing your own head against a wall
ps2: I wish you well

[soulreaper]

In sum - You're more likely to hear from people with bad feedback than those with good. You don't see members of any site posting here thanking people for being re-enabled after visiting the support channel, but you do see people whining about being denied.

This is the other side of the coin which we don't know about. This would certainly change our perception to some degree about the what.cd staff.

I'm not generalising or accusing any site in particular but my only concern is that a disabled user should be allowed to explain himself (if he wants to regain membership) properly before getting kicked from IRC. Ofcourse,I don't make the rules but I feel it's the ethical thing to do. From some IRC logs that i've seen,this doesn't always happen I'm afraid.

The amount of hatred in this forum towards me is intense. Perhaps it would be better if I didn't come here?

There are people here like myself who appreciate your assistance and explanation. Don't mean to be rude but if you think that people here are gonna oblige/agree with everything you say then you'll be disappointed.

[map07023]

This is what we have to work with:

-map07023 claims his name is Mike. This I believe, because he has a university email address.
-He invited a user who he calls Jon (jayb0ne), who invited himself twice.
-All accounts were disabled.
-Half a year later, a user called kw1k, who Mike claims he sold his computer to, and claims is Jon, signs up and invites Mike three hours later. He got the invites by donating with jayb0ne's (Jon's) email address, which he claims his invitee (so-called Jon, but really Mike) did.
-kw1k posted on the forums that his name was Jon.
-However, when we brought him into IRC for questioning, he claimed that his name was James, that he had invited Jon, and that Mike is some guy he hasn't known for years. He claims that jayb0ne (who Mike claims is Jon) is a previous coworker of his (Mike makes the same claim). ie, both Mike and James agree that jayb0ne is a previous coworker of theirs named Jon, despite (allegedly) Mike having donated on James's account with jayb0ne's email.
-We do know with 100% certainty that kw1k (James) invited the user map07023 (Mike), and not Jon as kw1k (James) claims.
-All users have the exact same taste in music.

Thus, the only logical conclusion is that they are all the same person (Mike) pretending to have multiple personalities and lying through his teeth. The kw1k account will be disabled (even if it isn't Mike, kw1k is still guilty of lying), and all other accounts will remain disabled.

I can ASSURE YOU, that mike and jon are not the same person. Map07023 (me) invited Jayb0ne (jon) who proceeded to invite himself multiple times. My account and his were both banned and the staff assumed that all jayb0nes accounts were mine (which they were not). A half a year later, kw1k (aka Jon aka jayb0ne) moved to a different location with a different ip address and used a computer that I had sold to him during our time at work together and got back on what.cd. He proceeded to toss me and invite, which i accepted while somewhat confused as to what was going on. We were both immediately banned again. There is no James in the story, he is non-exinsistant. There is only me (mike) and jayb0ne/kw1k (jon). We ARE NOT the same person, and I can provide so much evidence to prove this. I am not lying about anything, I am trying to prove the truth and get MY account back (map07023). You guys just keep assuming that I am lying and manipulating and that all these accounts are mine, but really they are not.

Whatman, please check the What.CD email. Thanks.

[pone44]

OP, I also have no idea what you got yourself into but you did break the rules, a few times if I read correctly. You invited a person that made multiple accounts got banned and then proceeded to make another account yourself, knowing you were banned there. I see nothing unfair. Basically created a lot of headaches for the staff there.

[Speedo]

I also lost my what account to "cheating", and both I and the accuser know it was bullcrap. Had about 7 Gb uploaded over a year giving about a 1.00 ratio.

I think it's a plan to sort out people that didn't use the account for everything. Like a dnb fan over 30 ever stood a chance of that teeny emo train. The whole thing was not smelling like anything washed.

Yeah. A cheater with those credentials. I am sure my ip will follow neatly into the folds of this comment.

Atleast I'm not a desperate dick...

[map07023]

All I know is that the staff of What.CD is downright stupid. They really think that I made multiple accounts despite so much evidence pointing to the fact that it is false. They are also extremely rude. I don't think I would want an invite back even if I was given one. Shocked at how dumb some of those people are...

[cinephilia]

be honest, you hate them cause they didn't reenable you.

[Tokeman]

Well its already been pointed out that you broke the rules, and not only once. You had more then one account yourself, and you had a friend that made multiple accounts. Considering you (and the guy you invited) broke the rules, you are lucky they even talked to you about it at all.

Learn from your mistakes and move on.

[emperorIX]

All I know is that the staff of What.CD is downright stupid. They really think that I made multiple accounts despite so much evidence pointing to the fact that it is false. They are also extremely rude. I don't think I would want an invite back even if I was given one. Shocked at how dumb some of those people are...

Haha, so you're mad now because What.cd wouldn't let you create multiple accounts? (Keep in mind that you DID create multiple accounts.)

One account per person per lifetime. Anyone creating additional accounts will be banned.

How much more clear could that be?