1) files should be treated as information which can be spread freely once it is released to someone
2) copyrights are only moral codes that ppl try to enforce (as the p2p networks suggest moral codes are impossible to enforce unless the persons morales correspond with the code)
3) the sharing of data is vital to growth and production, inhibiting it limits that
4) to much sharing can also inhibit growth if ppl are no longer willing to create anything new because they dont get anything out of it or very little due to sharing
5) the more anyone uses the law against someone that shares info w/o gaining anything from it, the more they back themselves into a corner because in reality copyrights were originally made to stop other ppl from profiting from someone elses ideas not keeping ppl from freely transmitting data
this is why i feel that p2p networks should be protected by freedom of speech
yet at the same time ppl should contribute something to the origin of the idea or invention so as to keep ppl inventing composing and creating new things
Bookmarks