A disclaimer

[ca_aok]

Like I said personal ethos.If someone politely requests that I don't specifically do something and it doesn't hurt anyone not to do it then personally I would think myself a total jerk if I didn't comply .

Maybe I'm not looking at the bigger picture, maybe I'm a naive idiot but that's how I chose to live my life or rather the minuscule the part of my life that I have any control over.

But... you could be an e-badass and an e-rebel by disobeying those simple requests! And at the end of the day, isn't that what we're all going for here?

[IdolEyes787]

Chicks do dig rebels.

[Artemis]

So end of the day i couldnt see management accepting this, making this discussion pretty much redundant.

No that would be irrelevant, , purportless or useless
Redundant would be me saying that your post sucks goat wiener.

And I'm the evil grammar wielding arch fiend ?

[Villalltheway]

So end of the day i couldnt see management accepting this, making this discussion pretty much redundant.

No that would be irrelevant, , purportless or useless
Redundant would be me saying that your post sucks goat wiener.

Alright alright chill out no need to get personal. But lets face it you know its true and everyone else knows it true that the vast majority of people come here looking for invites, and use the reviews and wtaw to see what they want.

The only thing that I see coming out of it is a lot of sour grapes and wasted time.Not something I think this ,or any , site needs to purposely propagate.

yet it remains i wonder why?

[Ewwwyourface]

sites are secret to get members with hype staff dont want reviews cuz they dont want every1 to see how terrible their site is lmfao
these nerds want ppl to join their joke sites wit no clue and say some shit like we are a communtiy to trick ppl into staying
cn u can get all the shit there on pub torrents with faster speeds but look at the frontpg says welcome to the family lmfao whenever u hear some1 say family and ur not real family u kno ur being manipulated lol
skittles has old shit no1 wants but they try to addict u with activity points lol
revolt has only 2 torrents wat the fk lmfao
nobody would kno this shit without reviews u dick riders can keep talkin its common courtesy to not have a trade section too lol

[cinephilia]

OK the sarcasm is starting to bore me, but cinephilia if you want people to take you seriously then making up words doesn't help......

.....ratiocinating/caviling

If either of these is in the dictionary please point them out.

there was absolutely no sarcasm intended.
and for the record, those words are not made up, just a bit uncommon i guess.

ratiocinate
ra·ti·oc·i·nate (rsh-s-nt)
intr.v. ra·ti·oc·i·nat·ed, ra·ti·oc·i·nat·ing, ra·ti·oc·i·nates

To reason methodically and logically.

[Latin raticinr, raticint-, from rati, calculation; see ratio.]

more info:
http://education.yahoo.com/reference...ry/ratiocinate

cavil
cav·il (kvl)

v. cav·iled also cav·illed, cav·il·ing also cav·il·ling, cav·ils also cav·ils
v.intr.
To find fault unnecessarily; raise trivial objections. See Synonyms at quibble.
v.tr.
To quibble about; detect petty flaws in.
n.
A carping or trivial objection.

[French caviller, from Old French, from Latin cavillr, to jeer, from cavilla, a jeering.]

more info:
http://www.alphadictionary.com/goodword/word/cavil

[Rart]

revolt has only 2 torrents wat the fk lmfao

While certainly not endorsing anything Ewwwyourface says something about the way this is said just makes me crack up

Thanks for that.

And to Artemis... ouch. Perhaps you really should've checked before saying that

[DonkeyPacker]

While I agree that the cons of posting a review of such a site outweigh the cons and would thus not do so myself I have always been massively annoyed by censorship of any kind so I would never advocate abstinence either. Just calculate how much you want to post whatever you post, how detrimental it could be to you and others, and this way the post will at least be educated. To some extent. I think I'm kinda rambling. Whatever, just my two cents.

[puckface]

[QUOTE=Artemis;3383527]

Then the reverse is surely true, if you see all sites as the same, why did you trade for them, or did they once have a value to you but no longer ?
I don't mean this question with any sort of malice truly, it just seems to me that your position now, and your former position as a trader are diametrically opposed ?

........Firstly, who said my position of a trader was former or current?

You have several times, in your own posts.

I think you misunderstood my question. I dont think I have ever said that I was done with trading, if I did the please excuse me. But my point was is that I never mentioned either way

Having a "value" as you put it is merely a measure of how difficult it is to enter a certain tracker

This is not my value system, this is the value system placed on trackers by those who wish to enter them based on their 'rarity'.

Mine either, just the one in wtaw.. I dont give a shit about that either

Lots of people break tracker rules everyday here, who am I to say what is right and wrong, all Im saying is that we do it equally.

So if I understand you correctly we should go for the lowest common denominator, i.e. not respect any tracker wishes at all, the url, internal screens, and all other relevant information should be public ? Doesn't really make them much of a private tracker then does it? Or should every tracker get rid of this silly invite system and just open registrations already ?

No..... I said equality. Equal, good or bad.. all or nothing, everyone the same, no one special. Get the point?

[1000possibleclaws]

Use common sense and weigh opportunity costs before making a review

I think you basically meant this, but wrote it out with more words?