[email protected]

[Tv Controls you]

I don't get your problem, Tv Controls you. Your account was irrefutably linked to warfront1 and Nuke0063, which were disabled less than a day before the tvcontrolsyou account was created. It's painfully obvious that you had multiple accounts, which is against the rules on basically all trackers.

You even managed to implicate yourself, by saying "Even a 'terrible user' such as myself had over 3 invites". The tvcontrolsyou account never had any invites - however, the original Nuke0063 account did.

Your account was disabled for ratio watch, you tried to get more, we found you and banned you. I don't see why we're at fault here.

I'm not nuke0063, that is my co worker. And I could prove that extensively. I logged onto the same computer as nuke0063, myself, and my invitor.
It is the local work machine. On the disabled channel I was not told anything near the lines that I was getting banned for nuke0063's offenses.

I would never get banned for a ratio watch ever... I have a seedbox and a dedicated torrent box hosted in my own house that is ran 24/7.

[7th]

I'm not nuke0063...

I'm starting to believe that you really enjoy all this... if not, you know you could avoid all this discussion again, don't you? C'mon, it's not that hard to leave all of this behind, specially now that you seems to don't care much for the tracker. (and I'm not trying to be ironic here, really).

And I'm just trying to share some respect to the OP He probably don't know about you're history with what.cd and now a new discussion/debate comes from nowhere and down into his thread?

[Tv Controls you]

I'm not nuke0063...

I'm starting to believe that you really enjoy all this... if not, you know you could avoid all this discussion again, don't you? C'mon, it's not that hard to leave all of this behind, specially now that you seems to don't care much for the tracker. (and I'm not trying to be ironic here, really).

And I'm just trying to share some respect to the OP He probably don't know about you're history with what.cd and now a new discussion/debate comes from nowhere and down into his thread?

I have no history wtf lol... I was banned (now I know from whatman) for the acts of another person, like seriously wtf.
He wanted to know about the rules, so I let him know they will ban your for "any reason at all".

Since I have this "history" with what.cd, that makes my statements less credible than anyone else's? I think not.
I enjoy this lol? So I should let everyone come in here and BS about how great what.cd is when I got screwed. I don't think so.

[7th]

I have no history wtf lol...

So you're a ghost or something? Anyway, I think you have a history and I have the right to think that And you even had a thread about you! I never had that! I'm envious/jealous, you know?

He wanted to know about the rules, so I let him know they will ban your for "any reason at all".

This is what you think and you have the right to think that. The problem is that you put it as an eminent true that will work for everyone Now, is it true that there are no "old" users at what.cd? I don't think so

Since I have this "history" with what.cd

That's what I said!

that makes my statements less credible than anyone else's? I think not.

That's what I didn't say Maybe someone else, not me

I enjoy this lol? So I should let everyone come in here and BS about how great what.cd is when I got screwed. I don't think so.

You could use things like: "In my opinion", "I think", "If you... maybe you'll..." I'm just kidding here but, whenever you state what you "think" as a "fact", others will come to "declare firmly" you're wrong

ps: OP, sorry, I won't be back here to continue this... I promise!

[Tv Controls you]

No I'm not just making it up....

Golden rule number 2:

Access to this website is a privilege, not a right, and it can be taken away from you for any reason.

http://whatinterviewprep.webs.com/pr...interview.html

Second bullet point.

[cinephilia]

You even managed to implicate yourself, by saying "Even a 'terrible user' such as myself had over 3 invites". The tvcontrolsyou account never had any invites - however, the original Nuke0063 account did.

what about that 'TVCy'?

[Tv Controls you]

You even managed to implicate yourself, by saying "Even a 'terrible user' such as myself had over 3 invites". The tvcontrolsyou account never had any invites - however, the original Nuke0063 account did.

what about that 'TVCy'?

I put terrible user in quotes as that's what what.cd makes me out to be.

I had invites on my one account (I believe it was named killzone08085) then I got banned for this BS, and made a new account tv controls you.
They then found that about a month afterwards and I went in and they said I was banned for a low ratio. Then they tried pinning me for two accounts lol.
I then cursed out the entire disabled channel if I remember correctly...

[superman1496]

You have to take an interview? I think some of the ppl at these sites are taking things a little too seriously.

[anon]

They only want members that can keep a ratio and have audio ripping/encoding knowledge (necessary to upload your own albums without getting them deleted) to get in. I don't see the problem with that. You can always get in without taking it if someone invites you anyway.

[superman1496]

They only want members that can keep a ratio and have audio ripping/encoding knowledge (necessary to upload your own albums without getting them deleted) to get in. I don't see the problem with that. You can always get in without taking it if someone invites you anyway.

I understand the logical reasoning, but lets be honest, they are putting alot of stipulations out for someone to join a site to download music illegally. Seems pretty ironic to me.