What.cd and Waffles ban Azureus and Deluge

[cap87]

FST policies are worse that i thought then

[The_Martinator]

As far as opinions go, I have no problem with Anon being here (the more opinions the better and I have seen him help people). I remember that he used to be DPed and if it were up to me he still would be.

Why? He is a cheater and he does help other people cheat (not directly, but still). The way things are atm, he really doesn't need the cheating forum, he can handle all the questions through PMs here. I'm not saying that he does, but he could. I'm sure he's a nice guy IRL, but as far as BT goes I wouldn't trust him.

Just my 2 cents.

[anon]

The way things are atm, he really doesn't need the cheating forum, he can handle all the questions through PMs here.

Helping FST users to cheat through PM? You must be wanting to be made fun of.

If someone asked me for specific cheating tips here, I'd report them. As you said, this isn't the cheating forum.

[The_Martinator]

The way things are atm, he really doesn't need the cheating forum, he can handle all the questions through PMs here.

Helping FST users to cheat through PM? You must be wanting to be made fun of.

If someone asked me for specific cheating tips here, I'd report them. As you said, this isn't the cheating forum.

Oh, OK, I'll just take your word for it...

And I have to lol at the fact that you have a split internet personality; the anon at the cheating forum and the ultra moral one here. I guess everything is possible online.

And don't worry about making fun of me, I can take. Just ask your Idols, to them it's a habit.

[anon]

Sorry for the delay, my proxy often pukes when submitting forms.

And I have to lol at the fact that you have a split internet personality; the anon at the cheating forum and the ultra moral one here. I guess everything is possible online.

How can you compare my would-be double personalities when you don't even know "the anon at the cheating forum"? One would think you can't compare things when you don't know one of them, but I guess everything is indeed possible online.

Just in case you care, I have written about legit seeding and given tips a lot of times there, too. Even once wrote a long post on how one of our users, who wanted to actually seed and even upload his own material to a specific tracker, could do so, instead of just cheating.Needless to say, due to the very nature of my forum, you won't find me speaking about why I cheat or "the spirit of P2P" as much as I do here, of course. Only when the topic springs up. Which obviously isn't as often.

And don't worry about making fun of me, I can take. Just ask your Idols, to them it's a habit.

The fun has already begun - I'm laughing at how fast you're to make assumptions. Oh, and that was a nice word game

[Cabalo]

And I have to lol at the fact that you have a split internet personality; the anon at the cheating forum and the ultra moral one here. I guess everything is possible online.

And don't worry about making fun of me, I can take. Just ask your Idols, to them it's a habit.

You seem to know really well how things are at his forum
How are the internet connections in slovenia?

[IdolEyes787]

FST policies are worse that i thought then

Did you even bother to read what I said or is it you are just so certain of everything that what other people have to say doesn't matter?
How about this show me one way that simply allowing anon to post has a negative effect on anyone and you can have your way and I will ban him.

[kukushka]

oh, hijacked thread, nice
on the new topic i could say that cheaters themselves aren't the only guys to blame in what they're doing. the whole ratio system is screwed so it encourage cheating, seedbox buffering with hit'n'running and other strange things... but first of all, it is the way in which the announce between client and tracker works that make relatively comfort space for all this cheating business. how much real nasty cheating can be done when there is one seeder and one leecher except for fake announcing of the transfer to rise stats?... in perfect world imo, client has to report to server transferred amount for every peer, of course it would meant more cpu load for the tracker but i'm sure there could be some workarounds to make this work okay...

[anon]

but first of all, it is the way in which the announce between client and tracker works that make relatively comfort space for all this cheating business. how much real nasty cheating can be done when there is one seeder and one leecher except for fake announcing of the transfer to rise stats?...

You don't need experience to avoid cheating on that kind of torrents, just common sense.

in perfect world imo, client has to report to server transferred amount for every peer, of course it would meant more cpu load for the tracker but i'm sure there could be some workarounds to make this work okay...

Not to mention the higher bandwidth usage. But what you're talking about is a subset of the "if no one is downloading, you can't be uploading" argument, something which is actually true but has yet to be taken to the form of anti-cheating scripts in a 100% effective way, which is impossible.

Anyway, I think that if you were a tracker admin and the amount of cheating on your site grew to such proportions, you should lower the river (i.e. check what's the real reason for it, and how you can fix that) instead of raising the bridge (coding every time tighter scripts).

[Quarterquack]

How about this show me one way that simply allowing anon to post has a negative effect on anyone and you can have your way and I will ban him.

His custom title tempts users to go exploring.

In all seriousness, though, do not ban him. From what I've seen of him on here (wouldn't know anything about his personality down at SBI) he is a decent fellow. Wouldn't make much sense to ban a person based on his actions at another forum, when all he tries to share here is thoughts.