View Poll Results: Do you use Azureus/Vuze?

Voters
164. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    46 28.05%
  • No

    118 71.95%
Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 118

Thread: Do you use Azureus/Vuze?

  1. #31
    Mostly civil BT Rep: +3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Age
    37
    Posts
    918
    Polarbear needs a shoulder to cry on coz he can't use his favourite client anymore,aww so sad, my condolences...

    UT all the way.

  2. BitTorrent   -   #32
    Cabalo's Avatar FileSharingTalker BT Rep: +24BT Rep +24BT Rep +24BT Rep +24BT Rep +24
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    European Union
    Age
    47
    Posts
    11,849
    26% so far. I'm quite impressed.

  3. BitTorrent   -   #33
    PerMaFrOsT's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +20BT Rep +20BT Rep +20BT Rep +20
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Underground
    Posts
    877
    Quote Originally Posted by Cabalo View Post
    26% so far. I'm quite impressed.
    Why Cabalo? Long since out exist alternatives that use less resources and greater performance than Azureus.

  4. BitTorrent   -   #34
    Yep I use it, Halite is my alternative at least for Waffles but What.cd isn't real big on updating their whitelist quickly, even now that several clients have been marginalized out of the system.

  5. BitTorrent   -   #35
    kcuestag's Avatar n00b
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by PerMaFrOsT View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Cabalo View Post
    26% so far. I'm quite impressed.
    Why Cabalo? Long since out exist alternatives that use less resources and greater performance than Azureus.
    Agreed.

    I've been using Azureus until it became "Vuze". Then I realised it was taking up too much resources ( By then I had a Pentium 4 with 1gb ram lol ).

    There are other WAY BETTER alternatives to Vuze to be honest.

  6. BitTorrent   -   #36
    cap87's Avatar wait, what?
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    249
    Tried it once... for a few hours.
    It sucked so i switched back to utorrent.

    Edit: It has much more options than utorrent (including some really interesting ones in the encryption field), but still it's not worth it because of the big resource usage.
    Last edited by ultrauploader; 02-26-2010 at 01:41 PM.

  7. BitTorrent   -   #37
    Zac090's Avatar t3h n00b BT Rep: +3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    662
    Nope.

  8. BitTorrent   -   #38
    7th's Avatar the brazilian guy BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    São Paulo
    Posts
    802
    No, I tried Azureus once. It looked nice but didn't work as well as utorrent. I must have configured something wrong for sure but now I'm glad I'm still using utorrent.

  9. BitTorrent   -   #39
    FileZ's Avatar WingChun Player BT Rep: +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    778
    Quote Originally Posted by 4by View Post
    never not even once ... Utorrent all the way
    +1





  10. BitTorrent   -   #40
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    UK
    Age
    41
    Posts
    15
    Utorrent all the way! nice and simple interface, very small install size and easy to manage connections, bandwidth and such.

Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •