Do you use Azureus/Vuze?

[brightsid]

Why?

[Cabalo]

As a Vuze user, this thread is of some concern for me.

@brightsid, for obvious reasons. It may serve a point in the future present.

[VoidNT]

I'm faithful Azureus / Vuze with classic UI for 3 years now. Have chosen it thanks to very comfortable (for me) interface, rich features, extensibility, good reputation on all trackers and Java platform (I'm Java developer myself).

Never encountered performance issues. I optimized its settings and jvm settings a little bit though. Plus 3gb of memory on my 24x7 comp is probably good enough. Running version 4.2.0.8 now, current session (no interruptions, no reloads, no reboots) continues for 107 days.

Despite that, my Vuze days are probably almost over. I'm still happy with Vuze, but I'm preparing to change my central machine with a new one and and configuring OpenSuse on it. Thought to install Vuze on Linux as well but with recent unfortunate developments I'm considering kTorrent and rTorrent with wTorrent interface.

[xisabella]

never ues it
but i think that`s good client

[Villalltheway]

Haved used it, but prefer utorrent all the way. There nothing that much wrong with vuze but i prefer the simple light weightness of utorrent.

Also i swear most trackers would reccoment utorrent over vuze.

[Darude9000]

No

[Cabalo]

bump

[Lovestoned]

Some of the plugins for Vuze were really good.. it's a shame it's not allowed in some trackers anymore.

[iJazz]

I like it because of the advanced features, but it is such a memory hog and slows down my whole system (Mac OS X). So I have switched to Transmission for most of the times.

[ketan]

why we should use azureus if there is utorrent