Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Pedro's and EAC/dBpoweramp

  1. #11
    ca_aok's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,543
    And to answer your question, LAME is generally considered the MP3 encoder of choice (even though some ABX tests on HydrogenAudio found that people found Helix the most transparent at 128kbps).
    Quote Originally Posted by whatcdfan View Post
    u are somewhat fairer then the last occasions but still pal i give a damn to what u said and expect i really dont need anything from u or optimuscrime i get what i want coz u 2 guyes dont own bittorrent and i dont think i portrayed any image i wrote simple english and u are seems to be very good at making assumptions if someone is not a cheater and u assume he's a cheater and write what u wrote and when u are proven wrong who u think will owe an apology then barack obama????

  2. BitTorrent   -   #12
    SideShowBob's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    18
    All this mp3 talk is way off topic, mp3 or any lossy format are not allowed on the tracker in question period, its all about quality. Nothing wrong with mp3 if your are happy with it. This site is for people who want the best quality and if you find that over kill its probably not the site for you.

    HydrogenAudio is probably the best place to discuss if x audio soft better than y audio soft, or if you don't understand why x ripper is better than y ripper.

  3. BitTorrent   -   #13
    SummerSamba's Avatar Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    USA
    Age
    55
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by SideShowBob View Post
    All this mp3 talk is way off topic, mp3 or any lossy format are not allowed on the tracker in question period, its all about quality. Nothing wrong with mp3 if your are happy with it. This site is for people who want the best quality and if you find that over kill its probably not the site for you.
    With storage as cheap as it is now, I don't see why people mess with anything less than FLAC, unless they cannot afford more drives. At some point, I am of the opinion that many trading MP3s will regret not having the original lossless source material to re-transcode.

    Storage allotments are only getting bigger, not smaller.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •