on the subject of freedom of expression

[devilsadvocate]

.
Gee whiz, all that typing, only to sum things up with a sentence that, nearest I can determine, agrees with me?

How sweet of you.

The bit aimed specifically at you corrects your erroneous statement

More correctly (in Texas, just the other day, in fact) liberals suggested U.S. history before 1877 be ignored.

However in emboldening my post you have highlighted an error of clarity on my part.

Please allow me to correct.


The biggest threat OF government interference with freedom of religion will come/comes from Christian social conservatives in government.

This doesn't imply that I'm accusing all or even most Christian social conservatives

[j2k4]

Correction allowed...it's still wrong.

I mentioned that there was a movement afoot in Texas to drastically change school curricula, and mentioned as well that the 1877 thingie was suggested; merely that.

That it was "suggested" (ridiculously, as an agenda item) is in fact a true thing.

Another true fact is that it was suggested, not by any conservative faction, but a liberal one.

Yet a third true fact is that it's mention does not in any way reflect on Christians or social conservatives, but rather (and only) on it's authors, who are of a decidedly liberal strain.

That you choose not to countenance these facts renders your statement the status of opinion, nothing more.

[unknown1_]

Mississippi consistently places at the bottom of the ranking when it comes to public education school programs right there with Hawai'i. So, this story doesn't surprise me..

[j2k4]

Mississippi consistently places at the bottom of the ranking when it comes to public education school programs right there with Hawai'i. So, this story doesn't surprise me..

The story there is Hawaii, not Mississippi.

It's all down to who's doing the plundering, you see.

Steal all propriety from the locals and the only concerns left to them are bungled horribly out of inexperience in basic decision-making.

It's an old story.