The Proof About Jews

[MediaSlayer]

Originally posted by Billy_Dean@26 October 2003 - 13:13
Maybe you should research before you ask these questions: Australia is doing a lot about it, new land rights are granted every week: Vast tracts of land are now back in Aborigine hands: Huge amounts of cash are being spent.

Every single Aborigine in the country has special rights, so much so, that you have white Australians pretending to be Aboriginal to cash in on the extra benefits. Now tell us all what Israel are doing?

Research this:



and this:


Three points:
Australia is not only a country, its a continent. They have alot of land to spare.

Some land is more valuable than other land. I'm referring to natural resources, global position, ect... I mention this because the west bank is not some deserted piece of worthless land. As you can see, the west bank and the gaza strip take up a significant portion of Israel(i'm not gonna even mention the golan heights). It's not like the palestinians are asking for the southern portion of Judea, which is mostly desert. That would be less of a strain on Israel. Israel has waaaayyyy less land to give than Australia, yet at various times, huge proportions were being offered to the palestinians. They didn't take it. Some people like to fight.

Another thing to consider, that's related to the point above: the middle of Australia is desert. I request Billy Dean to post a map of Australia showing which parts of Australia are being offered to the native people. If it's large tracts of land on the southeastern coast, I would be impressed. I propose you give them Victoria and South Australia. Proportionally, I think that would be about equal to the west bank and gaza strip in Israel. Be sure and respond quickly now Billy Dean, I'm eager to give the natives the good news!!!

[KcIrPaSiLuApJ]

Let me first say this; Australia is not a continent, it's a country, it belongs to the continent of Australasia, a simple geography lesson for you.



This is what's left of the West Bank at the moment. As the settlements increase, this land gets less and less. Remember, in 1948 they had all of it. And why did you mention the Golan Heights? You stole that from Syria, not the Palestinians.

To compare Aborigines to Palestinians is idiocy. They own more land than Israel, and get more every day. Large tracts of the East Coast? They own a lot of the East Coast, and more is in the pipeline. As for being desert - that's where a lot of them live, and that's the land they have asked for, their tribal lands.

To try to hide the appalling acts being perpetrated by the state of Israel, by calling other countries names is ludicrous. Are you seriously saying that Israel treats Palestinians better than Australia treats Aborigines? You must be sick! No wonder the world hates Israel.

[MediaSlayer]

@KcIrPaSiLuApJ-October 27th huh? Don't worry I'm sure no-one will notice.

Let me first say this; Australia is not a continent, it's a country, it belongs to the continent of Australasia, a simple geography lesson for you.

Do you seriously want to argue about the definition of a continent? So far not one single person has even been able to produce a fabricated story about being conspired against by a Jew or suffering at the hands of a Jew personally. The only thing that has been produced so far is hate and propaganda, aimed at Jews. The post above is a good example. Is that what you think of as politics? Flame people who have a different view than you? Would you kill them too? As I said before Guns don't kill people, ideologies kill people. Speaking of world domination, if the world were run by you, we would all be dead right now.

[KcIrPaSiLuApJ]

I was merely replying to your misinformed post. If you have no wish to discuss the definition of continent, why did you mention it?

As for running down jews, have I done that? It's an old trick to associate two seperate issues and claim they are the same. It's Israel the world hates, not jews - not all of them, anyway.

You also state that no-one has suffered personally at the hands of jews. When a country causes pain, suffering and death on a people, the way Israel is doing to the Palestinians, we all suffer personally, all that is, except people like you, who don't give a shit.

World domination? Who mentioned that? You really do have a problem, don't you?

Just one more point for folk to consider, your words ..

As you can see, the west bank and the gaza strip take up a significant portion of Israel

For your information, the West Bank and Gaza strip make up Palestine, not Israel, they don't take up one square inch of Israel.

[MediaSlayer]

Originally posted by KcIrPaSiLuApJ@27 October 2003 - 09:40
I was merely replying to your misinformed post. If you have no wish to discuss the definition of continent, why did you mention it?

As for running down jews, have I done that? It's an old trick to associate two seperate issues and claim they are the same. It's Israel the world hates, not jews - not all of them, anyway.

You also state that no-one has suffered personally at the hands of jews. When a country causes pain, suffering and death on a people, the way Israel is doing to the Palestinians, we all suffer personally, all that is, except people like you, who don't give a shit.

World domination? Who mentioned that? You really do have a problem, don't you?

Just one more point for folk to consider, your words ..

As you can see, the west bank and the gaza strip take up a significant portion of Israel

For your information, the West Bank and Gaza strip make up Palestine, not Israel, they don't take up one square inch of Israel.

I was merely replying to your misinformed post.

I was asking you if you were serious, and it sounds like you are. At any rate, here you go. I'm sure you won't agree, though.

As for running down jews, have I done that?  It's an old trick to associate two seperate issues and claim they are the same.  It's Israel the world hates, not jews - not all of them, anyway.

American Jewry, which is far more powerful than Israeli Jewry, supports Israeli policy. It has been mentioned in another thread about certain Jewish politicians who pass laws in order to help Israel. I have no idea why you don't hate them too, they are so much more influential in world affairs than any Israeli.

It's an old trick to associate two seperate issues and claim they are the same.

Are you a master of tricks? Is it a coincidence that this very hot debate gets started and suddenly people join the forum and jump right in with a new account?

You also state that no-one has suffered personally at the hands of jews.

I stated that no-one has been able to tell any real life stories about being conspired against by a Jew or suffering at the hands of a Jew. Not even a made up one, which is surprising. Why did I request it in the first place? Because I knew there would be emotionally charged people, like yourself, who would insert propaganda/dogmas instead of anything that resembles a fact.

World domination? Who mentioned that? You really do have a problem, don't you?

Look at the first post in this thread. Although I didn&#39;t specify what type of Jewish Conspiracy, I was talking about the usual "Jews control the world" or "Jews are gonna take over the world". In that 1st post, I was taunting those people who preach those theories and asking them to provide some shred of proof from real life experiences to prove it was true. An example of a real life experience is not "my tv said so". An example of a real life >read:first hand< experience would be "a Jewish person at my workplace discriminated against me" or something like that and give details.

[MediaSlayer]

@KcIrPaSiLuApj-Oh, and when are you gonna hand over Victoria to the native people? Have you met my friend?

[3RA1N1AC]

Originally posted by Rat Faced@26 October 2003 - 14:02
CONSERVATIVE:

Tending to preserve established traditions or institutions and to resist or oppose any changes in these: as, a conservative political party.

i think conservatives often push for the reinstatement of customs/policies/modes which are no longer in use by the mainstream. but simply because the things they favor are older, they claim to be preserving the customs. in many cases it&#39;s regression to abandoned customs that they&#39;re pushing for, rather than preservation.

for example (admittedly a broad one) puritan morality has been essentially abandoned by mainstream american society. to preserve the established modes would be to leave things exactly as they are. to re-establish the dominance of puritan values would be to regress. i&#39;m using "puritan" in a very loose sense of the word, of course-- prolly the better phrase would be "puritan-influenced."

[lynx]

I don&#39;t think your new id will fool anyone, Billy.

[lynx]

Regarding "Left" and "Right", I&#39;m sure many here would be surprised to learn that in the former Soviet Union, those in favour of a more "western" approach to politics were regarded as left-wing, with the right being occupied by those more in favour of stronger communist principles, and were regarded as conservatives. As far as I know the same currently applies in communist China.

It follows that to try to apply a global definition of the terms left and right in political terms is illogical, since the terms apply to the prevailing political climate of a region. If we are to use these terms at all, we need to state which political ideology we are using as a base.

[MediaSlayer]

Originally posted by lynx@27 October 2003 - 11:41
I don&#39;t think your new id will fool anyone, Billy.