The Proof About Jews

[MediaSlayer]

I think its time someone sit you down and have the "pedantic" talk with you

[ilw]

Originally posted by MediaSlayer@24 October 2003 - 10:41
Fair enough, but I would like to add something that perhaps you overlooked.  Do you know what world jewish population is?  Its hoovering at like 1%.  If the "anglo-saxon" peoples had a population so small as that, would they "stick together" and favor each other in everyday life over others?  You bet.  Tell me no with a straight face

Apparently its more like 0.25%, if it were only permissible for me to have sex with 0.125% of the population (and it will be a lot lower than this in various areas of the world) then yes i supppose i would be cliquey and I think i would also be much more amenable to the idea of marriage outside the religion. I might even be concerned about in-breeding. But I think the point is that Judaism has encouraged excessive favouritism and has been too internally focussed for centuries.

@Aussie Sheila: touche

[Billy_Dean]

Originally posted by ilw@24 October 2003 - 18:42
I missed you, soo..... what u wearing?

That little polkadot number you bought me for my birthday.

[AussieSheila]

I have you to thank mediaslayer.

So useful.

B)

Billy Dean??????

[ilw]

Originally posted by Billy_Dean+24 October 2003 - 10:55--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Billy_Dean @ 24 October 2003 - 10:55)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-ilw@24 October 2003 - 18:42
I missed you, soo..... what u wearing?

I&#39;m scampering around butt naked except for a gimp mask

[/b][/quote]
you are a kinky little thing aren&#39;t you

[AussieSheila]

@ilw &#39;Touche&#39; Billy Dean and you&#39;re in trouble.

[MediaSlayer]

Originally posted by ilw@24 October 2003 - 09:54
Apparently its more like 0.25%

Sorry for the bad statistic, but I don&#39;t think it really matters, and besides those surveys aren&#39;t scientifically accurate anyway. Just out of curiosity, how would you propose they become more open to the rest of society? Its kinda hard to welcome outsiders while fighting off attacks from all sides, no?

[protak]

Originally posted by Billy_Dean@24 October 2003 - 09:05

OK Billy&#33;&#33;&#33; YOU drudged it up. First I could not stomach the first chapter. Archhole, archenemy, architect..blah blah .. This is not Princess Diana&#39;s funeral, what you appeared to be referring to ( again did&#39;nt read it no interest ) was the Catholic Church??? This discussion is on Jewish wrongdoing&#39;s.? I will try to swallow your mis-representation and post a reply.

Ah, Tim, you didn&#39;t do British history at school then?

Mag·na Car·ta or Mag·na Char·ta

1. The charter of English political and civil liberties granted by King John at Runnymede in June 1215.


MS, tell me who does control the world&#39;s money supply?

Ah Billy still livin in the Mag-na world?? That&#39;s cool, to each his own&#33;&#33;
And please do not preach history to me, that&#39;s far beyond this conversation.

[ilw]

besides those surveys are scientifically accurate anyway. Just out of curiosity, how would you propose they become more open to the rest of society? Its kinda hard to welcome outsiders while fighting off attacks from all sides, no?

Damn those scientifically accurate surveys.
Well theres nothing I can suggest that wouldn&#39;t go against your religion. Cliquishness (thanks AS) is a result of various religious laws as is the nepotism. Being attacked on all sides at the moment is a result of geography and the high value you place on objectively worthless religious land.

[protak]

Originally posted by MediaSlayer@24 October 2003 - 09:54
I think its time someone sit you down and have the "pedantic" talk with you

Mediaman&#33;don&#39;t patrionize the guest&#39;s.

pedantic

narrow, often, ostentatious concern for learning

Word&#39;s get you no where, fact&#39;s will do wonder&#39;s.