What.cd Account Disabled

**WhatMan** · 04-02-2010, 06:26 PM

I think it's a bit unfair to say that we go by guilty until proven innocent, especially considering how we have over 100,000 users who haven't been disabled.

People aren't disabled until they're proven guilty already. So if they want to be re-enabled, they need to prove themselves innocent - or, at least, prove that they're honestly trying to redeem themselves.

In the cases of qdo0obp and jderu, they can come to the What.CD IRC and ask for me. However, one lie, and they'll be banned from the network. I don't have time to waste with liars.

**qdo0obp** · 04-02-2010, 07:02 PM

Thank you, that's fine, however I'm just about to go out tonight so I'm going to have to make you wait a bit. I have no idea what country you're based in but I'm UK so I'll just drop in and have a look for you occaisionally from around midday GMT.

**zedruslan** · 04-03-2010, 11:19 AM

Good evening to what.cd's staff What Man.
I was a member of what.cd (username: ruslanzpua) just for 2 hours from registration and than i've got banned

I registered at many others trackers and got good ratio and Power User status (Scene Legend on SCC) i never broken the trackers rules and very politely speak with staff.
I would like to say sorry for my situation that i was login from 2 IP and didnt inform you about my seedbox (coz it was my PC in my work office and cellphone) and say sorry all i did wrong that made you ban me on Your unique tracker. It will never happened again.

Could you give me the second chance?

**fairtrader** · 04-03-2010, 01:55 PM

^^Hop into their irc boy, there are high chances they will enable your account if what you say is correct.

**ca_aok** · 04-03-2010, 02:53 PM

And of course, if the invite didn't come from a trade or something

**TONiC** · 04-03-2010, 03:30 PM

they need to prove themselves innocent - or, at least, prove that they're honestly trying to redeem themselves.

They get banned because your system fails to see things at face value - this is something any other site with scripts suffers from. Problem is that this leads to staff PRESUMING they [banned/marked members] are guilty, and treating them as such, without giving them a "fair trial". The system is one sided. If it's not that "screenshots prove nothing" it's "we have your logs, we seen false announces", without any budge. God help you if you're Romanian. You know what the most retarded of your scripts is? The one that monitors cached CSS data. You know the one, check's whether I've visited a site, such as SB-I. Not if I've cheated, but if I visited a cheater's community. I think Anon can share his voice in this matter, ultimately SB-I found a way around it - NoScript and secure browser settings.

I put it to you to come onto "our" side for a change. Create a completely new account, completely seperate from your WhatMan account and get it banned. See what your staff are truly like.

**anon** · 04-03-2010, 04:57 PM

Originally Posted by TONiC

God help you if you're Romanian. You know what the most retarded of your scripts is? The one that monitors cached CSS data. You know the one, check's whether I've visited a site, such as SB-I. Not if I've cheated, but if I visited a cheater's community. I think Anon can share his voice in this matter, ultimately SB-I found a way around it - NoScript and secure browser settings.

They started using it in March 2009