Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Pwn2Own 2010: Google Chrome is the last man standing

  1. #11
    Slickerey's Avatar <3 FST BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    482
    So Google Chrome is pretty useful after all. Once they get ABP for Chrome, I'm switching browsers.

  2. News (Archive)   -   #12
    ca_aok's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,543
    This article seemed to spin it in a pro-Chrome way. I had heard that no one had even attempted to hack chrome at Pwn2Own, which makes the fact that it wasn't hacked rather moot. True, they patched a few security vulnerabilities in the weeks leading up to the competition which may have deterred some planned hacks but I'm not that confident that it's impossible to do.
    Quote Originally Posted by whatcdfan View Post
    u are somewhat fairer then the last occasions but still pal i give a damn to what u said and expect i really dont need anything from u or optimuscrime i get what i want coz u 2 guyes dont own bittorrent and i dont think i portrayed any image i wrote simple english and u are seems to be very good at making assumptions if someone is not a cheater and u assume he's a cheater and write what u wrote and when u are proven wrong who u think will owe an apology then barack obama????

  3. News (Archive)   -   #13
    As Chrome's share increases I think we'll see more hacks for it. I'd be hard pushed to move from Firefox, so many great addons that I couldn't possibly do without !!

  4. News (Archive)   -   #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Slickerey View Post
    Once they get ABP for Chrome, I'm switching browsers.
    A suggestion: search for "SRWare Iron".

    It also has a built-in ad blocker.
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."

  5. News (Archive)   -   #15
    iLOVENZB's Avatar FST Crew BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Land gurt by sea
    Posts
    8,333
    Quote Originally Posted by anon-sbi View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by jedispork View Post
    Actually Chrome is faster than firefox or ie.
    Is it faster than Opera 10.50?
    Opera has too many useless features. I found Chrome; Lightweight, Fast and Secure. The Add-ons for Chrome are still in it's infant stages but I'm sure we'll see a Spam-fest within the next year.

    Quote Originally Posted by anon-sbi View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Slickerey View Post
    Once they get ABP for Chrome, I'm switching browsers.
    A suggestion: search for "SRWare Iron".

    It also has a built-in ad blocker.
    Chrome + AdBlock extension
    https://chrome.google.com/extensions...namgkkbiglidom


    Sorry If I seem to be bashing your posts anon, but I really like what Google's doing with Chrome.
    "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music"

  6. News (Archive)   -   #16
    Quote Originally Posted by iLOVENZB View Post
    Opera has too many useless features.
    Don't use them Although that can't be denied - it'd be nice if there was some kind of lite version without the Unite stuff, for example, which I have no use for. That may make the browser start up faster or use less RAM.

    Chrome + AdBlock extension
    https://chrome.google.com/extensions...namgkkbiglidom


    Sorry If I seem to be bashing your posts anon, but I really like what Google's doing with Chrome.
    No problem, I forgot about that addon

    However, the main point of my post was suggesting Iron (a fork) over Chrome because of the removed tracking features.
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •