Norton

[Damnatory]

I'm still using Norton Antivirus 2000, is the Newest one, NAV 2004 really all that much better? Worth the install?

[the-ninja69]

I never used norton 2000 but its like almost a 4 yr gap so I assuming it is better. Probably has more options and better scanning engine etc.

[asmithz]

2004 sucks, 2003 and corp 8.1 is the best.

[the-ninja69]

Why does 2004 sux? I have just upgraded from 2003 pro to 2004 pro and it is working well with no problems and I like it so far.

[Damnatory]

Originally posted by the-ninja69@25 October 2003 - 09:39
I never used norton 2000 but its like almost a 4 yr gap so I assuming it is better. Probably has more options and better scanning engine etc.

Yeah I realise the "age" difference, but I've heard some very mixed feelings about 2004. Especially the fact that its still so new and buggy.

So 2003 Corp Ed. 8.1 is best?

[the-ninja69]

I have to agree though 2003 pro is a solid anti-virus and works well. Despite what ppl say about 2004 my computer runs it fine and it is doing a damn good job.

[Damnatory]

Okay I'm downloading Norton Antivirus 2003 Professional Edition right now
Will I need to uninstall 2000, or will the installer just update the old files and overwrite?

[Damnatory]

You it's kind of ironic, and maybe just done out of habit, but I just scanned Norton Antivirus 2003 with Norton 2000....
What can I say, I hate viruses...

[sparsely]

Originally posted by Damnatory
So 2003 Corp Ed. 8.1 is best?

No. those are two seperate versions.

NAV 2003
and
SAV 8.1 Corporate

I prefer the corporate version, myself.