And besides taking a person's word whether it was intentional or not( "honest mister I didn't know he was banned " when I sold him the invite) how exactingly is the staff suppose to determine that?
I think the point is for the sake of expediency guilt is presumed and the onus is on the person to prove otherwise.If they didn't do that with all the miscreants out there seeing opportunity I doubt if there would be time left for staff to do anything but constant arbitration.
Bookmarks