AVG, it fails hardcore with detection
symantec, it consistently hogs up resources and locks your pc down so much that programs dont work.
mcafee
.
.
.
.....
.....
.
.
defintely say mcafee. but, norton is right up there.
I have tried macfee norton synaptec kaspersky micorsoft security essentials all recently new releases and I dont like having any. they all cause bad computer slowdowns and I still have had problems with viruses and junk with them. When i had protection it was like having a radar detector i thought i could push the limit and I still got caught out. So now I run bareback and just pay attention to the portals i dip my tool into. So the worst is having one and the best is using your brain and asking is it a good idea to d/l this. if this was a girl that was rumored to hav the herp would it still be worth the risk... and sometimes when i'm desparate i click anyway and yes it ends up in an aw F, time to reformat.
Last edited by rdtphd; 08-27-2010 at 05:25 PM.
I see some responses that norton is the worst antivirus . Norton is pretty decent nowadays . It used to be a resource hog but it got better . It's light and efficient but not as light as eset of course .
On the other hand f-secure is really really bad .
norton is useless.
avast antivirus
Bookmarks