I want it to be alive, you try to kill it.
P2P is based on upload, not on download.
So it's, at least, more mine than yours.
I want it to be alive, you try to kill it.
P2P is based on upload, not on download.
So it's, at least, more mine than yours.
So what is your problem then?
Well, you're talking to me as if I used P2P and leeched 24/7 without uploading anything, or coded those eMule leecher mods. At least that's the impression I get. Both statements are false. Just thought I'd make that clear. Cheers.
Last edited by anon; 01-09-2011 at 06:50 PM.
"I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
well i used emule few years back for few rare tracks...well emule is slow as a fuck...i installed a tweaked version of emule...i was able to catch 400-500 kb/s
torrent & warez extremly fast![]()
Just curious, which version was it? If you don't want to say it here feel free to PMBecause there are many non-leecher mods that are significantly faster than the vanilla eMule.
1. some people call file hosters "warez", although that's an incorrect term.
2. so if eMule isn't blazing fast for people, they don't have a fucking clue about how P2P works?![]()
"I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
"OCH is faster than eMule!!1" --> no fucking clue about how P2P works. (Besides that, non-premium Uploading.to etc. are significantly slower than eMule.)
People who say $P2PNetworkA would be "faster" than $P2PNetworkB don't have a clue about what their DL speed depends on, so: Yep.
And Mediafire is lightning fast. It's all about which hosters we're talking about.
Maybe they don't want to go to the effort of making those conditions proper when that's done largely more transparently on $P2PNetworkB.People who say $P2PNetworkA would be "faster" than $P2PNetworkB don't have a clue about what their DL speed depends on, so: Yep.![]()
"I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
Bookmarks