Emule or Torrents

[Tuxman]

I want it to be alive, you try to kill it.
P2P is based on upload, not on download.

So it's, at least, more mine than yours.

[anon]

I want it to be alive, you try to kill it.

I don't even use eMule. Or torrents. Or P2P.

[Tuxman]

So what is your problem then?

[anon]

Well, you're talking to me as if I used P2P and leeched 24/7 without uploading anything, or coded those eMule leecher mods. At least that's the impression I get. Both statements are false. Just thought I'd make that clear. Cheers.

[johhny]

well i used emule few years back for few rare tracks...well emule is slow as a fuck...i installed a tweaked version of emule...i was able to catch 400-500 kb/s
torrent & warez extremly fast

[Tuxman]

well emule is slow as a fuck... (...) torrent & warez extremly fast

1. "Warez" is not a P2P network.
2. You don't have any fucking clue about how P2P works.

[anon]

i installed a tweaked version of emule...i was able to catch 400-500 kb/s

Just curious, which version was it? If you don't want to say it here feel free to PM Because there are many non-leecher mods that are significantly faster than the vanilla eMule.

1. "Warez" is not a P2P network.
2. You don't have any fucking clue about how P2P works.

1. some people call file hosters "warez", although that's an incorrect term.
2. so if eMule isn't blazing fast for people, they don't have a fucking clue about how P2P works?

[Tuxman]

1. some people call file hosters "warez", although that's an incorrect term.

"OCH is faster than eMule!!1" --> no fucking clue about how P2P works. (Besides that, non-premium Uploading.to etc. are significantly slower than eMule.)

2. so if eMule isn't blazing fast for people, they don't have a fucking clue about how P2P works?

People who say $P2PNetworkA would be "faster" than $P2PNetworkB don't have a clue about what their DL speed depends on, so: Yep.

[anon]

"OCH is faster than eMule!!1" --> no fucking clue about how P2P works. (Besides that, non-premium Uploading.to etc. are significantly slower than eMule.)

And Mediafire is lightning fast. It's all about which hosters we're talking about.

People who say $P2PNetworkA would be "faster" than $P2PNetworkB don't have a clue about what their DL speed depends on, so: Yep.

Maybe they don't want to go to the effort of making those conditions proper when that's done largely more transparently on $P2PNetworkB.

[Tuxman]

It's all about which hosters we're talking about.

You can't take hosters as a comparison object for P2P networks. (Well, you can, but...)

Maybe they don't want to go to the effort of making those conditions proper when that's done largely more transparently on $P2PNetworkB.

Which does not falsify my thesis, does it?