Emule or Torrents

[diceman89]

Which would you say is better? What are some of the pros and cons of the two? I've never used emule, so I'm curious.

[anon]

In a nutshell, eMule's retention for old stuff is fantastic, but the wait times and speeds are exasperating. With torrents it's the exact opposite.

Emule or Torrents

Definitely, torrents for new stuff.

[Expeto]

Which would you say is better?

depends, what you wanna do(wnload)?

[Stabber]

Torrents are way better in terms of speed . If you can't find something on torrents, and on rapidshare then use emule

[darkinc]

You can find lots of stuff on emule but ,torrents are better if you want to download new stuff.

[zot]

I consider Emule a very useful tool in finding rare files. When I'm looking for something, I first search on Usenet, and if I can't find it, then Bittorrent or filehosts like Rapidshare. Then eMule last in line.

There are a lot of things on ED2K that can't be found anywhere else. Just don't be in a hurry

[Stabber]

Whenever i search for a rare album or movie i can always find it on emule . This is the power of emule , the rare files which you can't find on trackers

[winddy]

Emule still better atm

[anon]

Emule still better atm

And why would that be..?

[Tuxman]

eMule has everything, including a f*cking search function. Should be enough reason not to use BitTorrent bs.

The BT speed depends on its seeders, just like eMule's, BTW. "BT is better in terms of speed" is nonsense.