Cpu Comparison

[Virtualbody1234]

F*ck off with your overclocking garbage. They are still 333 MHz FSB processors.

I just proved you wrong and now you use overclocking to defend your point?

Bullshit! Utter bullshit.


The point is you cannot run PC 133 RAM with it. Right?

[Lamsey]

Originally posted by _John_Lennon_@3 November 2003 - 21:10
Im well aware that with the exception of the newer 3000, and 3200 Barton are set to the 166.5 Mhz Front Side Bus, x2 being where they get the 333Mhz Bus Speed, but that doesnt mean that my Barton cant run at that.

What's your point? The fact that they can be overclocked to 400MHz FSB doesn't make them 400MHz FSB processors.

AMD rate, and sell them, as 333MHz FSB processors. Therefore that is what they are.

[_John_Lennon_]

Originally posted by Lamsey+3 November 2003 - 16:20--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lamsey @ 3 November 2003 - 16:20)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-_John_Lennon_@3 November 2003 - 21:10
Im well aware that with the exception of the newer 3000, and 3200 Barton are set to the 166.5 Mhz Front Side Bus, x2 being where they get the 333Mhz Bus Speed, but that doesnt mean that my Barton cant run at that.

What&#39;s your point? The fact that they can be overclocked to 400MHz FSB doesn&#39;t make them 400MHz FSB processors.

AMD rate, and sell them, as 333MHz FSB processors. Therefore that is what they are. [/b][/quote]
And the fact that there merely sold as 333Mhz processors doesnt meant that they cant be 400Mhz.

[the-ninja69]

There talking about when you buy them and compare them, not when you OC and compare. Your an idiot.

[Virtualbody1234]

So why don&#39;t you answer the real question, _John_Lennon_ ?

The point is you cannot run PC 133 RAM with it. Am I right or wrong ?

All this talk about overclocking to 400 mhz FSB was all a way to change the subject away from that real point anyway.

[_John_Lennon_]

Real point, alas, we have strayed havnt we?

Anyway, yes, It is my belief that you can, indeed run a ahtlon processor, and im almost positive the Barton&#39;s on SDRam, of course, like I hinted at earlier, the performance would be poorer than using them with their regular DDR required Ram.

And I am aware that you cannot achieve a bus speed of the 333Mhz for even the lower end Bartons using SD Ram, seeing as how the top frequency of 133Mhz only ends of equaling a total of 266 For the system Bus.

So once again, Virtual, im well aware that you cant run bartons on SD Ram at a Side Bus speed of 333Mhz, but that doesnt mean that they wont run at Speeds below that.

[Virtualbody1234]

Real point, alas, we have strayed havnt we?

No we have not strayed. You have. Not me.


So now it&#39;s below 333 MHz that you want to run it?

Show me a motherboard made for the Barton and PC133 RAM then.


What a complete farce this whole thing.

You&#39;re just wrong. That&#39;s all.

[_John_Lennon_]

Originally posted by Virtualbody1234@3 November 2003 - 23:24

Real point, alas, we have strayed havnt we?

Show me a motherboard made for the Barton and PC133 RAM then.

Motherboards that will run thorughbreads can run SD Ram, and they can run Bartons as well, because of the same socket type.

So shall i show you an AMD motherboard that supports SD Ram then?

[Virtualbody1234]

Originally posted by Virtualbody1234@4 November 2003 - 00:24
You&#39;re just wrong. That&#39;s all.

Boy, you certanly have a problem admitting when you&#39;re just wrong.

[Kunal]

*laughs at vb1234 for basking in his own alleged glory*