Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 48

Thread: Cpu Comparison

  1. #31
    Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    666
    Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@2 November 2003 - 02:56
    Out of the 2.2 Ghz Pentium 4 and the 2500+ Barton core which one would run faster? What about a 2.2 Ghz P4 and a 2700+ Barton core. I found a 2.2 Ghz P4 for 110 bux on tiger direct they are having a huge sell and they are all new. A 3.0 Ghz for 240!
    i got lost after that was said

    U RNT LEET LIKE ME!!!!!!!!!11111111111111

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #32
    _John_Lennon_'s Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Strawberry Fields
    Posts
    1,176
    Originally posted by Virtualbody1234+4 November 2003 - 15:58--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Virtualbody1234 @ 4 November 2003 - 15:58)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Virtualbody1234@4 November 2003 - 00:24
    You&#39;re just wrong. That&#39;s all.
    Boy, you certanly have a problem admitting when you&#39;re just wrong. [/b][/quote]
    Wrong about what, your just claiming that you have won, rofl.

    Good tatic,

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #33
    Virtualbody1234's Avatar Forum Star BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    10,763
    You&#39;ve been wrong all along about the PC133 and the Barton not being 333 MHz FSB.

    And I already proved you wrong about the Barton.

    I also like the fact that this thread would have been long gone by now but you keep bumping it up to show people just how ridiculous this is.

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #34
    _John_Lennon_'s Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Strawberry Fields
    Posts
    1,176
    Originally posted by Virtualbody1234@4 November 2003 - 18:43
    You&#39;ve been wrong all along.

    I also like the fact that this thread would have been long gone by now but you keep bumping it up to show people just how ridiculous this is.
    I keep bumping it up, yes.

    Oh and btw, once again, you still are avoiding the whole concept of actually stating what I am supposdly wrong about.

    Mind signing onto AIM for this? the 30sec flood control is starting to get annoying, between this topic, and all the others im checking.

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #35
    Virtualbody1234's Avatar Forum Star BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    10,763
    About AIM. Not a chance.

    And I just edited about what you&#39;re wrong about.

    Edit: I even know that your next argument is to show me a board that runs at 266 FSB with PC133 RAM. And that you could thoeretically drop in a Barton. But that would just be even more stupid.

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #36
    _John_Lennon_'s Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Strawberry Fields
    Posts
    1,176
    About the Barton- Nearly everyone I know runs their barton at the 400Mhz Side Bus speed, so I refer to it as a 400Mhz Side Bus processor., notmatter which clocked version you buy from AMD>

    About the PC133 Ram- Once again, I am confident that you can run a barton on SD Ram, just put it in a board that support the SD Ram. Im not saying it will run at its normal speed, im just saying THAT YOU CAN.

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #37
    Virtualbody1234's Avatar Forum Star BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    10,763
    Nearly everyone knows that when AMD puts 333 MHz FSB on the package, that it&#39;s a 333 MHz FSB CPU.

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #38
    man, you guys are funny&#33;

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #39
    Virtualbody1234's Avatar Forum Star BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    10,763
    And, _John_Lennon_, you bore me.

    We&#39;ve been though all this stuff already.

  10. Software & Hardware   -   #40
    _John_Lennon_'s Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Strawberry Fields
    Posts
    1,176
    Originally posted by Virtualbody1234@4 November 2003 - 19:08
    Nearly everyone knows that when AMD puts 333 MHz FSB on the package, that it&#39;s a 333 MHz FSB CPU.
    Sigh, once again, just because its a 333Mhz CPU in the box, which im well aware it is doesnt mean that it can ONLY BE 333MHZ.

    Right, so, thats setteled.

    Anyone up for drinks?

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •