BitHQ's Wall of Shame

[Mihai]

Originally Posted by echohead
cheaters are just crying over privacy out of fear that they could legitimately lose accounts on several sites if their info gets posted on bithq.

Funny.You know what would be even funnier?Tracker staff ignoring your public list because they are not idiot enough to ban somebody because of a statement made on your tracker

[ca_aok]

I love it when cheaters get butthurt

[Quarterquack]

I love it when cheaters get butthurt

I'm going to hurt you.

[ca_aok]

That was in reference to mihai who is actually a cheater, not you

[anon]

1) Many cheaters turn off their upload entirely, some of their client mods have this functionality built in. Why bother seeding when you can just fudge the numbers? Not only does this decrease the number of actual seeds in the swarm, but can at times lead to more hashfails for the regular users depending on the sophistication of the cheating tool.

Not true.

[A]

...for the sake of being able to claim there will be a flood of innocent people accused of cheating that have their personal information exposed. In reality what will happen is that any account flagged as "cheating" will be carefully reviewed before any information is added to the wall of shame, and a fair number of legitimate cheaters will be blacklisted from several private sites.

You dont get it do you?Releasing personal info publically cheater or not is the problem here.And about that java thing,I wasnt saying it isnt being developed,I can only lmao when you say its a perfect cheat detecting system.In what ever ways one looks at it,what you guys are going to do is bullshit.How would you like if your IP,email address etc gets plastered all over the place?

[Quarterquack]

Save your breath Aby. I already asked him that and he said he would never put himself in such a position. You might as well start calling him brickwall instead of echohead.

[mrnobody]

Originally Posted by echohead
cheaters are just crying over privacy out of fear that they could legitimately lose accounts on several sites if their info gets posted on bithq.

Funny.You know what would be even funnier?Tracker staff ignoring your public list because they are not idiot enough to ban somebody because of a statement made on your tracker

That was in reference to mihai who is actually a cheater, not you

[Aristocles]

echohead:

By what criterion/criteria is/are the following measured:

". . . bittorrent forum whores . . ."

That is to 'say', what defines the above? Would it be anyone who expresses disagreement with your individual thoughts or your overall argument? Be those disagreements ultimately valid or invalid. . .

Considering the skills of some of these guys and their clear lack of moral qualms, I would think long and hard about splashing their 'personal details' on a web page. If some are actually vicious, then guess who will next have their "personal details" up for grabs?

anon:

Clearly I am rather a brutish dolt and have totally missed that you are a blatant 'cheater' (contextually interesting term). Admittedly I have read on here references to it but I thought it was merely goodnatured ribbing. Specifically, why do you engage in such nefarious behavior?

[anon]

anon:

Clearly I am rather a brutish dolt and have totally missed that you are a blatant 'cheater' (contextually interesting term). Admittedly I have read on here references to it but I thought it was merely goodnatured ribbing. Specifically, why do you engage in such nefarious behavior?

https://filesharingtalk.com/threads/3...27#post3335927