Should a scene tracker allow P2P releases?

**Polarbear** · 08-18-2010, 08:45 AM

**AKADEMiJA** · 08-18-2010, 09:33 AM

Thats not scene ( only ) tracker anymore, but i guess nothing is black or white today.

**b3owulf** · 08-18-2010, 09:48 AM

Do you feel more 1337 on a scene tracker rather than on Scene+p2p one? A lot of p2p groups release QH stuff which is just better than some Scene releases, it would be dull to allow only and only Scene. Of cours I'm not saying that all that are strictly Scene-only like SCC and TV should upload p2p, but FTN is a whoe different story.

The thread should be renamed since we all know which tracker Polarbear has in mind.

**Di@monds** · 08-18-2010, 12:32 PM

Originally Posted by Polarbear

Should a scene tracker allow P2P releases?

to be or not to be....just create your own tracker and you can do whatever you want.

Originally Posted by b3owulf

Do you feel more 1337 on a scene tracker rather than on Scene+p2p one? A lot of p2p groups release QH stuff which is just better than some Scene releases, it would be dull to allow only and only Scene. Of cours I'm not saying that all that are strictly Scene-only like SCC and TV should upload p2p, but FTN is a whoe different story.

SCC and SceneHD are both strictly scene-only.

**IdolEyes787** · 08-18-2010, 12:35 PM

Originally Posted by Polarbear

Should a scene tracker allow P2P releases?

Is this a trick question?
And no,not all of us being particularly giving a fuck as to the intricacies of stupid shit ,know which tracker Polarbear is talking about.
I will say that any general tracker that artificially limits it's potential content is patently ,to use the word again ,stupid.

**Night0wl** · 08-18-2010, 01:47 PM

I have seen several P2P rips on SCC, so maybe look harder if you can't find them.

As for why this poll is even here, I have no idea. Non-members opinion on whether a site, which again, they are not even a member of, should do this or that is completely irrelevant IMO. If someone is a member then vote and voice their opinion in the relevant thread.

All in all this site is filled with people who want quality, while the site in question has at least a quarter of members picking scene over quality.

**ca_aok** · 08-18-2010, 02:01 PM

Someone in the original discussion thread over there was going on about how Scene HD stuff was better than P2P because of "standards". Clearly they're uninformed regarding what P2P releases would constitute (they probably assume it's all aXXo). Anyway I don't really care, it's a 0-day site, that's what I expect from it.

**Night0wl** · 08-18-2010, 02:10 PM

Actually not even uninformed, just purposely ignorant. But nothing can be done there, since I managed to get it locked by drunk posting.

I still think the site specific discussion belongs there and not here.

**ca_aok** · 08-18-2010, 02:33 PM

Oh I completely agree. Sort of reminds me of the "Do You Use Azureus" Poll after What/Waffles banned it. Threads here aren't going to change anything and the opinions of people who aren't members aren't going to change their minds...

**anon** · 08-18-2010, 03:22 PM

A "pure" Scene tracker would, in theory, never allow P2P releases. Not to say I don't like them, though - 90% of the movies I download are from that kind of groups.

Originally Posted by Night0wl

I have seen several P2P rips on SCC, so maybe look harder if you can't find them.

This I wasn't aware of.