Last one to post wins the internets

[manker]

Ostensibly a good point but it's pretty self-serving when you think about it. Otherwise you won't get a chance for a repeat.
Plus she'll tell her mates if you were shite and they won't let you near their lady-gardens.

Anyway, I just thought it was polite to pre-emptorily reciprocate, no matter how much fannying about you have to do.

If it settles your mind and allows you to sleep better, I've never had a problem with making a partner orgasm, in fact entirely the opposite is true of my endevours with ladies.

Ignoring for a moment that the opposite of never having a problem is always having a problem ... no wait, I can't ignore it because I just re-read it with that in mind and you're saying that although you've never had a problem making a partner orgasm, the opposite is true of your endeavours with ladies.

It does follow that a true misogynist would never describe a woman as a partner.

u r a fag lol

[NotLettingItGo]

...

It does follow that a true misogynist would never describe a woman as a partner.

u r a fag lol

It follows from what? Personal experience? Is that a confession? That you know what a true misogynist would describe a woman as, because you are a true misogynist?

[megabyteme]

I was actually starting to believe Reject was a scorned lesbian.

[NotLettingItGo]

You were just hoping I'd allow you to watch.

[megabyteme]

You were just hoping I'd allow you to watch.

No, just figured you were too bitchy to be male.

[NotLettingItGo]

No, just figured you were too bitchy to be male.

Yyyeeesss!!! You read so much into my posts that I very nearly stopped having to write them, you were doing such a good job for me

[manker]

...

It does follow that a true misogynist would never describe a woman as a partner.

u r a fag lol

It follows from what? Personal experience? Is that a confession? That you know what a true misogynist would describe a woman as, because you are a true misogynist?

It follows using wordular logic.
Unless you think that someone who hates women would describe one as being equal.

Maybe some kind of masochistic misogynist would, idk.

[NotLettingItGo]

...
Unless you think that someone who hates women would describe one as being equal.

...

Hmmm early onset dementure maybe?

I said she told me I wasn't her equal, not that I didn't consider her my equal.

I've never had a problem with women being my equals, but maybe MBM can help you, he seems to believe that a man treating a woman in exactly the same way as women treat men, is a woman hater... odd really. Still I'm sure he'll be happy to explain it all to you.

[manker]

I was actually starting to believe Reject was a scorned lesbian.

The thought probably occured to most of us - til he outed himself just then.

Maybe the misogyny gives him a mental pass to justify cawk-smuggling.
Who knows

[manker]

...
Unless you think that someone who hates women would describe one as being equal.

...

Hmmm early onset dementure maybe?

I said she told me I wasn't her equal, not that I didn't consider her my equal.

I've never had a problem with women being my equals, but maybe MBM can help you, he seems to believe that a man treating a woman in exactly the same way as women treat men, is a woman hater... odd really. Still I'm sure he'll be happy to explain it all to you.

No idea why that tangent seemed appropriate but I was just answering your question about why I thought it followed that a misogynist wouldn't describe a woman as a partner.

I rarely make linguistic leaps based on your own personal experience, strange as that may sound.