What is the big deal if someone joins a newly opened tracker which he finds interesting just because he said he had no interest in the then current trackers?If a new tracker pops up offering something different than the rest and if that interests you,joining it is going back on your word?
Or is it something else that made you say this?
Originally Posted by Idoleyes
Last edited by A; 09-06-2010 at 08:01 PM.
^^ I am not sure if he is telling us how he truly feels or he is covering it up so maybe it doesn't smell quite as bad.
Anal is the only form of birth control shown to be 100% effective. Even abstinence failed once.
First,Truly pathetic display of crap.Originally Posted by Idoleyes
Second I was perfectly clear on what I was getting at and it seems you were so full of yourself to see that.You seem to think the world revolves around you,No it dosent.Just because you dont like something,you want others also to be like you or what.If people like to get movies from a specific releasing group,its none of your business.If people like to get the movie first and want to join trackers for fast pre times,again its none of your business.If people compare each frame of a movie side by side and then chose a particular movie from a particular encoding group,again its none of your business,Some like to download only flac and some like to only download 1080p HD only,yet again its none of your business.You dont like it,yea we get it,now shut it will ya?
BT dosen't revolve around your "ideals".
If you dont care about "torrenting" then why do you continuously keep on trolling those threads at the give away and trade section?Originally Posted by Idoleyes
I didn't mean saying "Thank you", literally. That's as worthless as "+1" comments. I meant the other kind of thanks giving, the one that could help them produce more material that I enjoy consuming. Camming, whether you believe it or not, is an expensive business; as is source hunting from leakers. It gets to the point where the hardware/discs are actually "shared" instead of being bought in one go, contrary to popular belief, and I happen to know multiple people in the business. So when I say that I intend to thank them/support them, I also thought I really didn't need to spell this one out.
As for getting it first; yes, to me, it matters a lot. You and I have argued this point before, and I said pretimes do matter to a certain extent. I also explained that I used to be a source supplier for a gaming group in the past, and so I understand the thrill/rush of being "first"/knowing that it's not simply about credits, but it's about being the best etc. I'm sorry if it seems pointless to you, it feels a bit shallow to me, as well. However it is something I did and enjoyed for years and it's hard to get it out of my system. Being first means a lot to people, some more than others, but to me, especially with some content, it's not first by a few seconds or minutes; it's actually being first by days.
I don't get a thrill from the chase, nor do I trick myself into believing that watching a shitty quality cam on my computer makes me an 1337er than someone that enjoyed the span of the movie on a great screen for the price of a cup of coffee. I watch the movies that I wouldn't watch in theaters anyway, either due to my preferred company having watched it without me, therefore necessitating a private viewing by myself, or because I would favor watching other movies on the big screen, knowing I'd never get a chance for this movie/don't like the idea of it, but am still intrigued enough to see it. Basically: The only time I resort to cams/TS's are actually when I wouldn't make a box office count, either way.
I duly apologize that not all of us are pricks that go back on our word on a daily basis, even if we are "on the internets". By the way, we haven't met before, and I would usually tell you to sod off, considering you're borderline baiting me into it; but you know, blue star woes.
Ellipses go here.
What the fuck has this thread turned into?
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music"
A lame pissing match. Like the majority of the threads in this bt section...
It's rather fun watching this ...
@ Ringhunter: You claim not to be part of any trackers that have IMAGINE-releases, yet I know of 2 trackers that have their releases, and I know for a fact you are a member there too?
Can you feel the LOVE
Right, you're referring to the ones that were started/staffed by the same people, I'm assuming. If so, then yes, but they are in no way offering a comprehensive set of releases. Most of the time they only house one or two of the releases, and those die or are trumped promptly when a different version/reason to delete them is given. The problem is, and I know this may sound weird, I actually prefer to have my options open, with all the "10-20 P2P releases" that everyone seems to hate on. Towards the end of the TSing/Camming phase of any movie's life, there's usually so many edits done to the movie, it's a borderline curves/contrast atrocity.
Moreover, when I say IMAGiNE it's just a generalization. There are other groups hopping on board, too, such as FLAWL3SS/Silentninja/TOXiC etc. And whether you choose to believe me or not, I do sometimes hunt down their releases specifically, considering they each tweak the settings to their liking, and I don't consistently prefer any particular group/person. When the two ratioless trackers came up with their "p2p or not" debates, I asked for both FLAWL3SS/IMAGiNE in both cases, because I do tend to jump camps more often than not.
Ellipses go here.
Bookmarks