Invention Of Ratio Cheating

[IdolEyes787]

fuck them. pm me your mail for what.cd.

this post says it all, do i need to add anything
it goes to show the difference of "evaluation ability" between a member having 4700 posts and the members having 10 (optimus crime), 3 (evil walks) posts.

This post says it all in that it demonstrates the difference between reason and idiocy.

[anon]

this post says it all, do i need to add anything
it goes to show the difference of "evaluation ability" between a member having 4700 posts and the members having 10 (optimus crime), 3 (evil walks) posts.

Fuck it too, PM your e-mail.

I want to prove members with 8426 posts also have better "evaluation ability" skills than those with lower postcounts.

[KFlint]

Think the evaluation ability comes automagically at 4500 posts, that might be just a rumor though... felt anything special back then?

[anon]

Think the evaluation ability comes automagically at 4500 posts, that might be just a rumor though... felt anything special back then?

I don't remember... I don't remember!

[Cabalo]

fuck them. pm me your mail for what.cd.

This fellow is a true gentleman. How altruistic.

[n00bz0r]

[A]

fuck them. pm me your mail for what.cd.

This fellow is a true gentleman. How altruistic.

Or maybe he is high or something.

[EvilWalks]

fuck them. pm me your mail for what.cd.

this post says it all, do i need to add anything
it goes to show the difference of "evaluation ability" between a member having 4700 posts and the members having 10 (optimus crime), 3 (evil walks) posts.

I don't invite stranger anywhere, regardless of how you come across. The fact that someone decided to invite you, from a thread where you ask about cheating ratios, and specifically mention What.cd is pure idiocy in my opinion. But whatever, each unto their own.

And btw, don't assume because I judged you to be a ratio cheater, that I also think you are a 'bad' person, or even somehow a lesser class torrenter... I honestly don't care. Was just voicing opinion. When you start a thread like this one, you really need to be prepared to receive some replies that you probably won't agree with.

[That1Guy]

This thread has made me more stupider.....

[optimuscrime]

when i said "i get what i want" i actually meant the content and not the tracker and if u look close at the topic of my request thread it says "[req]what.cd or waffles" and not "what.cd and waffles" which means i wanted either one of them and when i got waffles i closed the thread so i get what i want and once again u r wrong and rejected

Ok wafflesfan. I guess my evaluation ability must not understand why someone would invite you. Its hilarious if you count the fact that people in your IP range are banned from the interview process for cheating, you have a thread asking how to cheat/ how cheating works( orhowever you want to nitpick it,) you clearly do not have the bandwidth to easily (key word easily,) maintain a decent ratio, and you whine and insult anyone who thinks differently than you.

I'm sure you will fit right in. I suppose I should start spewing out useless posts since post count at FST directly correlates to my "evaluation ability."