Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 58

Thread: Proposition 107-- Ending Reverse Discrimination (Affirmative Action)

  1. #41
    clocker's Avatar Shovel Ready
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    15,305
    Quote Originally Posted by 999969999 View Post
    I am delighted to report that Proposition 107 passed by 60% of Arizona voters. It is now against state law to offer preferential treatment in hiring based upon a person's skin color, ethnic background, or gender.
    So, does this mean all the unqualified white males in Arizona are now out of work?
    Huzzah, indeed.
    "I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg

  2. The Drawing Room   -   #42
    Quote Originally Posted by clocker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by 999969999 View Post
    I am delighted to report that Proposition 107 passed by 60% of Arizona voters. It is now against state law to offer preferential treatment in hiring based upon a person's skin color, ethnic background, or gender.
    So, does this mean all the unqualified white males in Arizona are now out of work?
    Huzzah, indeed.
    What it means is that preferential treatment based on race and gender -- sometimes called racism or sexism by liberals, depending upon who it hurts -- is now against state law.

    It's merely a baby step in the right direction.
    Who can take your money and give it to someone else? The Government Can! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO2eh...layer_embedded

  3. The Drawing Room   -   #43
    megabyteme's Avatar RASPBERRY RIPPLE BT Rep: +19BT Rep +19BT Rep +19BT Rep +19
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Using Mrs. Nussbaum's CC#
    Posts
    17,942
    Quote Originally Posted by 999969999 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by clocker View Post
    So, does this mean all the unqualified white males in Arizona are now out of work?
    Huzzah, indeed.
    It's merely a baby step in the right direction.
    1960, working on 1950?

    However, the feds will smack this down like an insolent [pick your least favorite race] child.

    This merely shows that 60% of the voters in Arizona don't know what the law truly does. Read my second to last post in this thread for details.

    *EDIT* Or do, just don't like minorities in jobs (including good ones) proportionate to their percentage of state population. (yeah, that's all it does-assumes that all people should be represented equally in the job market).
    Last edited by megabyteme; 11-04-2010 at 06:56 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by IdolEyes787 View Post
    Ghey lumberjacks, wolverines, blackflies in the summer, polar bears in the winter, that's basically Canada in a nutshell.

  4. The Drawing Room   -   #44
    BANNED BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    501
    I won't even dignify that with a response. Anyone with half a brain cell can see why.

    Later Sweetheart.

  5. The Drawing Room   -   #45
    clocker's Avatar Shovel Ready
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    15,305
    Quote Originally Posted by 999969999 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by clocker View Post
    So, does this mean all the unqualified white males in Arizona are now out of work?
    Huzzah, indeed.
    What it means is that preferential treatment based on race and gender -- sometimes called racism or sexism by liberals, depending upon who it hurts -- is now against state law.

    It's merely a baby step in the right direction.
    I'll ask again...does this mean that all the unqualified white males will lose their jobs?
    "I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg

  6. The Drawing Room   -   #46
    j2k4's Avatar en(un)lightened
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oh, please...
    Posts
    16,298
    Quote Originally Posted by clocker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by 999969999 View Post

    What it means is that preferential treatment based on race and gender -- sometimes called racism or sexism by liberals, depending upon who it hurts -- is now against state law.

    It's merely a baby step in the right direction.
    I'll ask again...does this mean that all the unqualified white males will lose their jobs?
    I assume, then, that you favor reparations for American slavery.

    The correlation to the situation in AZ is no less tenuous than your assertion that "unqualified white males" should give up their jobs.

    In any case, Arizona is inhabited by Arizonans, and it is Arizonans who should determine how their state is run.

    If Hispanics find it inhospitable, they will depart, leaving the state poorer for their lack, and bringing ridicule to it's residents.

    What's it to you?
    "Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."

    -Mark Twain

  7. The Drawing Room   -   #47
    sandman_1's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    519
    Quote Originally Posted by clocker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by 999969999 View Post

    What it means is that preferential treatment based on race and gender -- sometimes called racism or sexism by liberals, depending upon who it hurts -- is now against state law.

    It's merely a baby step in the right direction.
    I'll ask again...does this mean that all the unqualified white males will lose their jobs?
    And who would be "unqualified", white, and male hired by Affirmative Action program? Wait they don't have that job because some other "unqualified" [insert minority] got it. Is that what you were saying?

  8. The Drawing Room   -   #48
    clocker's Avatar Shovel Ready
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    15,305
    J2, I know you favor assumptions over facts, so carry on.

    sandman...gee, who could I use to exemplify the "unqualified white male" stereotype...um, GW Bush?
    "I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg

  9. The Drawing Room   -   #49
    megabyteme's Avatar RASPBERRY RIPPLE BT Rep: +19BT Rep +19BT Rep +19BT Rep +19
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Using Mrs. Nussbaum's CC#
    Posts
    17,942
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4 View Post
    In any case, Arizona is inhabited by Arizonans, and it is Arizonans who should determine how their state is run.

    If Hispanics find it inhospitable, they will depart, leaving the state poorer for their lack, and bringing ridicule to it's residents.

    What's it to you?
    So, Hispanics (Latinos) aren't Arizonans because they lack majority in the state?

    Would you be so quick/understanding if a majority deemed you and your family unwelcome in your state?

    I'll give you credit for seeing the message being aimed at illegal AND legal Latinos in Arizona.
    Quote Originally Posted by IdolEyes787 View Post
    Ghey lumberjacks, wolverines, blackflies in the summer, polar bears in the winter, that's basically Canada in a nutshell.

  10. The Drawing Room   -   #50
    clocker's Avatar Shovel Ready
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    15,305
    It's only "reverse" discrimination that upsets the right, regular ole discrimination is A-OK in their book.

    It's only a matter of time before Arizona runs out of water, so the problem will solve itself anyway.
    "I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •