...
BT Rep: +1
Which you are exactly doing now and when you were "following the conversation" before?Originally Posted by ringhunter
Nah not really. I think I was confused by the mixed signals of you calling me trash, and continuing to argue infantile points that only trash would care about.Nah not really.I don't like to 'chit chat' with trash like you.Wasn't that obvious?
Last edited by A; 10-24-2010 at 05:00 PM.
Make love, not war!
<3 FST
BT Rep: +2
I decide to give out an invite and everyone provides me with free entertainment. Maybe I should give invites out more often...
A.W.A
BT Rep: +2
if u wud have had pinched a smiley along with it wud have become more interesting
that's very unlikely.if u wud have had pinched a smiley along with it wud have become more interesting
A.W.A
BT Rep: +2
bcoz i didnt got his mood is he angry or is he celebrating.........a smiley wud have helped
mind u iam not gay and it isnt a war its a debate..........
Last edited by whatcdfan; 10-24-2010 at 05:09 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
seems like a war from my chair.
sprclfrglstcxpldcs
BT Rep: +3
Are you actually this thick? I've quickly drafted up a rearrangement of who wins this thread's stupidity title:Which you are exactly doing now and when you were "following the conversation" before?
1) AbyBeats - For exceptional stupidity in ignoring all forms of wit, insisting insults can win him an argument, being a great judge on all things trash or not, and failing to follow conversations in post/tree form. (The funny part is he will regret winning this argument because he thought the runners-up were both less intelligent than himself.)
2) whatcdfan - For truly pointing out what racists armed with visions of righteousness are capable of when given a keyboard.
3) Barclays - Even though at first it seemed like he was in the lead, he later proved he was unfit for the title for catching on to one instance of sarcasm. Pity, I had some money down on him. Cut the soccer references out, though, bro.
Ellipses go here.
A.W.A
BT Rep: +2
now u r showing some intelligence u think u can surround me in ur racism theory...........well good luckAre you actually this thick? I've quickly drafted up a rearrangement of who wins this thread's stupidity title:Which you are exactly doing now and when you were "following the conversation" before?
1) AbyBeats - For exceptional stupidity in ignoring all forms of wit, insisting insults can win him an argument, being a great judge on all things trash or not, and failing to follow conversations in post/tree form. (The funny part is he will regret winning this argument because he thought the runners-up were both less intelligent than himself.)
2) whatcdfan - For truly pointing out what racists armed with visions of righteousness are capable of when given a keyboard.
3) Barclays - Even though at first it seemed like he was in the lead, he later proved he was unfit for the title for catching on to one instance of sarcasm. Pity, I had some money down on him. Cut the soccer references out, though, bro.
neither do i challenge ur history and current events knowledge
and +1 for creativity in ur last post.......................
but whatever you shouldn't have said anything related to abybeats familia
...
BT Rep: +1
kAre you actually this thick? I've quickly drafted up a rearrangement of who wins this thread's stupidity title:Which you are exactly doing now and when you were "following the conversation" before?
1) AbyBeats - For exceptional stupidity in ignoring all forms of wit, insisting insults can win him an argument, being a great judge on all things trash or not, and failing to follow conversations in post/tree form. (The funny part is he will regret winning this argument because he thought the runners-up were both less intelligent than himself.)
and this is what ringhunter means by "following conversations"
and beware of ringhunter's high grade wits and also remember he doesn't insult anyone one.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks