lea88 and whatcdfan spreading the love

[whatcdfan]

your responses don't address many of my points

i made that post from my working computer in one shot as you can see its unedited but having said that i really dont need to address all those fake points you raised, yes fake points and if you cant help yourself to realize that then how can you expect me to?

and your misinterpretation of the words I am using is doing you a disservice.

only because the grounds those words are raised from are not valid but hay that is my opinion of course they are all valid from your viewpoint without even being challenged

My point being that what people say to each other online DOES matter

you will have to work hard to take me there discussing it and its kinda unlikely unless you judge the dispute story unbiased to its merit.

let me quote here the contradictions of your post and my reasons for not taking it any further,

every post you make in response proves that point

You prove it by wasting your time to tell me how I'm wrong

this is what i meant with the first quote of my previous post, and this is what i meant "you should wait and let me speak" in the post prior to that but since you are so sure about what you are speaking and got into this discussion only to impose all that on me is kind of unjustified from my end and since you have already declared it a waste of time do not expect a reply from me

My observation is that what we say online matters.

its not limited to this much only. you have completely ignored the considerations and altered the reality part of it in order to make it fit into your "no go" effort

Deal with and try to stop misdirecting the subject of yours and mines "debate".

already successfully dealt it with apparently you are having problems and you are the one who is up to prove something

you followed her to another thread to both insult and troll her

You forget to quote/comment what happened before it this is what i meant with "altering the reality in order to make it fit into your perspective" and "drive wishful conclusions" which are largely affected with personal bias.

If you term catching a lier and making it public in order to alarm the innocent inviters as "insult", i suggest you should buy a dictionary for yourself.

It's her thread, and whether you like it or not, it will be her thread

And how does exactly "her thread" forbid me to post in it? this aint a personal property its a public forum and now i see your point, i dont have the right to post in her thread and she has all the right in the world to tell me who i am, great going man

btw you need to learn a lesson about the public forum culture instead of trying to teach me one

Just because you take advantage of the tendencies of the moderators to let anything go, does not make it right.

i am not a relative of any mod, their vision was not draped by "fake assumptions" as yours and they did not saw only one side of the story to drive wishful meaningless conclusion of it.your being so impartial and one sided take that it was wrong dosent make it universally wrong either.

It's quite cowardly actually.

in which godly language of the world " standing upto and proving the accusations" make it actually cowardly and if you think its other way around why dont you show me some bravery by not replying to any post where i am straight forwardly interacting with you

And for the love of god, learn the definition of the word metaphor.

Did, i apologies for that

I know english is not your first language

i am glad you did not dragged me into burning hot desert sun for that

[Quarterquack]

In this topic: Whatcdfan says what people say online doesn't matter*. Intra4nny says it does and pseudo-harasses Whatcdfan (justifiably). Whatcdfan gets butthurt and defends himself, countering his original point.

TL;DR:

In this topic: Failed philosophical points of view being pulled out from under the people that uphold them.

* - A statement that negates itself.

[Intr4ns1t]

In this topic: Whatcdfan says what people say online doesn't matter*. Intra4nny says it does and pseudo-harasses Whatcdfan (justifiably). Whatcdfan gets butthurt and defends himself, countering his original point.

TL;DR:

In this topic: Failed philosophical points of view being pulled out from under the people that uphold them.

* - A statement that negates itself.

That's one of the fun things about philosophizing, it doesn't matter if there is a right or wrong. (yeah, I'm snickering over this post o' mine )

[A]

In this topic: Whatcdfan says what people say online doesn't matter*. Intra4nny says it does and pseudo-harasses Whatcdfan (justifiably). Whatcdfan gets butthurt and defends himself, countering his original point.

TL;DR:

In this topic: Failed philosophical points of view being pulled out from under the people that uphold them.

* - A statement that negates itself.

That's one of the fun things about philosophizing, it doesn't matter if there is a right or wrong. (yeah, I'm snickering over this post o' mine )

But when discussing philosophy, it should be relative to the subject at hand.

[zinku]

whatcdfan looks familiar ..

lea88 is lea88

[Intr4ns1t]

But when discussing philosophy, it should be relative to the subject at hand.

I disagree in this instance. Shall I give my arguments for why? This thread was a cull, with the most likely purpose of telling both whatcdfan and lea88 to get the fuck over it. I made a point that I felt was toward that goal, and now that the discussion of that point I raised has degraded to selective quoting and straw men, I don't see a purpose to carrying that particular ort of oratory any further. Besides, I feel I demonstrated my original point quite well, despite the devolution of that back and forth.

[A]

But when discussing philosophy, it should be relative to the subject at hand.

I disagree in this instance. Shall I give my arguments for why? This thread was a cull, with the most likely purpose of telling both whatcdfan and lea88 to get the fuck over it. I made a point that I felt was toward that goal, and now that the discussion of that point I raised has degraded to selective quoting and straw men, I don't see a purpose to carrying that particular ort of oratory any further. Besides, I feel I demonstrated my original point quite well, despite the devolution of that back and forth.

But, do you think GOD will like us and humanity for making such posts in FST? The mere thought troubles my mind.Maybe GOD doesn't like discussions at all.We should all treat others as childrens of GOD and never hurt their feelings. (I think, I made my point )

[Intr4ns1t]

But, do you think GOD will like us and humanity for making such posts in FST? The mere thought troubles my mind.Maybe GOD doesn't like discussions at all.We should all treat others as childrens of GOD and never hurt their feelings. (I think, I made my point )

I'll be completely honest AbyBeats, I dislike discussing religiosity, and I have to ask, what posts are you referring to?

[A]

But, do you think GOD will like us and humanity for making such posts in FST? The mere thought troubles my mind.Maybe GOD doesn't like discussions at all.We should all treat others as childrens of GOD and never hurt their feelings. (I think, I made my point )

I'll be completely honest AbyBeats, I dislike discussing religiosity, and I have to ask, what posts are you referring to?

Ans:

But when discussing philosophy, it should be relative to the subject at hand.

I disagree in this instance. Shall I give my arguments for why? This thread was a cull, with the most likely purpose of telling both whatcdfan and lea88 to get the fuck over it. I made a point that I felt was toward that goal, and now that the discussion of that point I raised has degraded to selective quoting and straw men, I don't see a purpose to carrying that particular ort of oratory any further. Besides, I feel I demonstrated my original point quite well, despite the devolution of that back and forth.

(I think I made my point for the 2nd time )

[cinephilia]

rename the thread: whatcdfan and Intr4ns1t spreading the love